«Urban Problems and sPatial methods VolUme 17, nUmber 1 • 2015 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and ...»
Smartphones were a key technology in the study. They combined GPS tracking with the ability to take georeferenced photographs, both of which could be monitored in real time by syncing data through the phone’s data plan to ensure I was aware of any ongoing technical problems. The phones could also be used to collect food-shopping diary entries from study participants, although only one participant did so in this case. Phones had sporadic technical problems. Finding reliable software to collect GPS data was one obstacle. Future research using this approach should confirm the availability of suitable software or consider budgeting for the development of a custom application. The inclusion of photographs in this study was useful, but many photographs were unfortunately of low quality (were blurry or had poor lighting). Phones with better cameras may have 92 Urban Problems and Spatial Methods Rethinking Food Deserts Using Mixed-Methods GIS improved image quality through technologies like image stabilization. This project did not explicitly use the photo-voice method (Belon et al., 2014; Mahmood et al., 2012), but providing more instruction on how to use the cameras and encouraging participants to capture defining features of each food source would have borrowed elements of this approach that may have improved photo quality and usefulness.
The analysis of food environments is only one aspect of increasing reliance on spatial analytics in “smart city” initiatives (Townsend, 2013). This data-based approach to urban governance provides valuable insight on how policy initiatives can alter patterns of everyday life. As even this smallscale study suggests, however, the idea that a reliance on robust quantitative indicators produces a theory-free form of governance is fundamentally problematic (Anderson, 2008). The qualitative data developed in this project were essential to interpretation of both shopping diaries and GPS data. Through study interviews and focus groups, participants and I developed a shared understanding of the factors that shaped their food-provisioning behavior. The situated perspectives of neighborhood residents, not just their data, were needed (Haraway, 1988; Pavlovskaya and St.
Martin, 2007). This mixed-methods approach thus provides one model for a participatory geospatial analysis of food access.
The growth of mobile GIS applications provides new opportunities for representing and understanding the everyday practices that form the rhythm of urban life. Future research can leverage this technology by exploring not just where food is, but where, how, and why urban residents draw on available food sources. This approach might use a smartphone application that city governments or nonprofit groups would custom design for their research. Targeted case studies in selected neighborhoods, similar to this project, might also prove useful. This small-scale study also generates broader research possibilities, such as analysis of existing transit data or citywide surveys of perceived store quality and neighborhood safety. Using this mix of methodologies to understand the everyday experiences of urban residents can thus suggest pathways to healthier, more livable cities.
Author Jerry Shannon is a limited-term assistant professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Georgia.
References Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete,” Wired, June 23, 2008. http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory.
Apparicio, Philippe, Marie-Soleil Cloutier, and Richard Shearmur. 2007. “The Case of Montréal’s Missing Food Deserts: Evaluation of Accessibility to Food Supermarkets,” International Journal of Health Geographics 6 (4): 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-4.
Belon, Ana Paula, Laura M. Nieuwendyk, Helen Vallianatos, and Candace I.J. Nykiforuk. 2014.
“How Community Environment Shapes Physical Activity: Perceptions Revealed Through the PhotoVoice Method,” Social Science and Medicine 116C: 10–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.027.
Black, Christina, Graham Moon, and Janis Baird. 2014. “Dietary Inequalities: What Is the Evidence
for the Effect of the Neighbourhood Food Environment?” Health and Place 27C: 229–242. DOI:
Block, Daniel, and Joanne Kouba. 2007. “A Comparison of the Availability and Affordability of a Market Basket in Two Communities in the Chicago Area,” Public Health Nutrition 9 (7): 837–845.
Boone-Heinonen, Janne, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Catarina I. Kiefe, James M. Shikany, Cora E. Lewis, and Barry M. Popkin. 2011. “Fast Food Restaurants and Food Stores: Longitudinal Associations With Diet in Young to Middle-Aged Adults: The CARDIA Study,” Archives of Internal Medicine 171 (13): 1162–1170. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.283.
Boston Mayor’s Office. 2012. “Mayor Menino Leads First Ever U.S. Conference of Mayors Food Policy Task Force.” Press release. Boston: Mayor’s Office. http://www.cityofboston.gov/news/default.
Caspi, Caitlin E., Glorian Sorensen, S.V. Subramanian, and Ichiro Kawachi. 2012. “The Local Food Environment and Diet: A Systematic Review,” Health and Place 18 (5): 1172–1187. DOI: 10.1016/ j.healthplace.2012.05.006.
Clifton, Kelly J. 2004. “Mobility Strategies and Food Shopping for Low-Income Famlies: A Case Study,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (4): 402–413. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04264919.
Cope, Meghan, and Sarah Elwood (eds.). 2009. Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Cummins, Steven, Ellen Flint, and Stephen A. Matthews. 2014. “New Neighborhood Grocery Store Increased Awareness of Food Access but Did Not Alter Dietary Habits or Obesity,” Health Affairs 33 (2): 283–291. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0512.
Cummins, Steven, and Sally Macintyre. 2002. “A Systematic Study of an Urban Foodscape: The
Price and Availability of Food in Greater Glasgow,” Urban Studies 39 (11): 2115–2130. DOI:
———. 1999. “The Location of Food Stores in Urban Areas: A Case Study in Glasgow,” British Food Journal 101 (7): 545–553. DOI: 10.1108/00070709910279027.
Elwood, Sarah. 2009. “Mixed Methods: Thinking, Doing, and Asking in Multiple Ways.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, edited by Dydia DeLyser, Steve Herbert, Stuart Aitken, Mike Crang, and Linda McDowell. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Gustafson, Alison, Sarah Lewis, Sarah Perkins, Corey Wilson, Elizabeth Buckner, and Ann Vail.
2013. “Neighbourhood and Consumer Food Environment Is Associated With Dietary Intake Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants in Fayette County, Kentucky,” Public Health Nutrition 16 (7): 1–9. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013000505.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
Hendrickson, Deja, Chery Smith, and Nicole Eikenberry. 2006. “Fruit and Vegetable Access in
Four Low-Income Food Deserts Communities in Minnesota,” Agriculture and Human Values 23:
371–383. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-006-9002-8.
Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hutchinson, Paul L., J.N. Bodor, Chris M. Swalm, Janet C. Rice, and Donald Rose. 2012. “Neighbourhood Food Environments and Obesity in Southeast Louisiana,” Health and Place 18 (4): 854–
860. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.03.006.
Knigge, LaDona, and Meghan Cope. 2006. “Grounded Visualization: Integrating the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data Through Grounded Theory and Visualization,” Environment and Planning A 38 (11): 2021–2037. DOI: 10.1068/a37327.
Kwan, Mei-Po. 2008. “From Oral Histories to Visual Narratives: Re-Presenting the Post-September 11 Experiences of the Muslim Women in the USA,” Social and Cultural Geography 9 (6): 653–669.
Latham, Alan. 2003. “Urbanity, Lifestyle and Making Sense of the New Urban Cultural
Economy: Notes From Auckland, New Zealand,” Urban Studies 40 (9): 1699–1724. DOI:
Ledoux, Timothy F., and Igor Vojnovic. 2012. “Going Outside the Neighborhood: The Shopping Patterns and Adaptations of Disadvantaged Consumers Living in the Lower Eastside Neighborhoods of Detroit, Michigan,” Health and Place 19C: 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.010.
Lee, Helen. 2012. “The Role of Local Food Availability in Explaining Obesity Risk Among Young School-Aged Children,” Social Science and Medicine 74 (8): 1193–1203. DOI: 10.1016/ j.socscimed.2011.12.036.
Mahmood, Atiya, Habib Chaudhury, Yvonne L. Michael, Michael Campo, Kara Hay, and Ann Sarte.
2012. “A Photovoice Documentation of the Role of Neighborhood Physical and Social Environments in Older Adults’ Physical Activity in Two Metropolitan Areas in North America,” Social Science and Medicine 74 (8): 1180–1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.039.
Matthews, Stephen A., James E. Detwiler, and Linda M. Burton. 2005. “Geo-Ethnography: Coupling Geographic Information Analysis Techniques With Ethnographic Methods in Urban Research,” Cartographica 40 (4): 75–90.
Nightingale, Andrea. 2003. “A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management,” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2 (1): 77–90.
O’Sullivan, David. 2006. “Geographical Information Science: Citical GIS,” Progress in Human Geography 30 (6): 783–791. DOI: 10.1177/0309132506071528.
Pavlovskaya, Marianna, and Kevin St. Martin. 2007. “Feminism and Geographic Information Systems: From a Missing Object to a Mapping Subject,” Geography Compass 1 (3): 583–606. DOI:
Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative. 2014. “The Reinvestment Fund.” http://www.trfund.
Rogalsky, Jennifer. 2010. “Bartering for Basics: Using Ethnography and Travel Diaries To Understand Transportation Constraints and Social Networks Among Working-Poor Women,” Urban Geography 31 (8): 1018–1038. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3618.104.22.1688.
Sampson, Robert J. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Shannon, Jerry. 2014. “What Does SNAP Benefit Usage Tell Us About Food Access in Low-Income Neighborhoods?” Social Science and Medicine 107: 89–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.socscimed.2014.02.021.
Sheppard, Eric. 2005. “Knowledge Production Through Critical GIS: Genealogy and Prospects,” Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information 40 (4): 5–21. DOI: 10.3138/ GH27-1847-QP71-7TP7.
Townsend, Anthony M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia.
New York: Norton.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service. 2014. “Food Access Research Atlas—Documentation.” http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/ documentation.aspx#definitions.
———. 2009. “Access to Affordable and Nutritious Food—Measuring and Understanding Food Deserts and Their Consequences: Report to Congress.” http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/242675/ ap036_1_.pdf.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 2010. “Obama Administration Details Healthy Food Financing Initiative.” Press release. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://wayback.archive-it.org/3926/20131018160911/http://www.hhs.gov/news/ press/2010pres/02/20100219a.html.
Wrigley, Neil. 2002. “‘Food Deserts’ in British Cities: Policy Context and Research Priorities,” Urban Studies 39 (11): 2029–2040. DOI: 10.1080/0042098022000011344.
Zenk, Shannon N., Angela M. Odoms-Young, Constance Dallas, Elaine Hardy, April Watkins, Jacqueline Hoskins-Wroten, and Loys Holland. 2010. “‘You Have To Hunt for the Fruits, the Vegetables’: Environmental Barriers and Adaptive Strategies To Acquire Food in a Low-Income
African American Neighborhood,” Health Education and Behavior 38 (3): 282–292. DOI:
Zenk, Shannon N., Amy J. Schulz, Barbara A. Israel, Sherman A. James, Shuming Bao, and Mark L.
Wilson. 2005. “Neighborhood Racial Composition, Neighborhood Poverty, and the Spatial Accessibility of Supermarkets in Metropolitan Detroit,” American Journal of Public Health 95 (4): 660–667.
96 Urban Problems and Spatial Methods
Spatializing Segregation Measures:
An Approach To Better Depict Social Relationships Masayoshi Oka University of Alcalá David W.S. Wong University of Hong Kong George Mason University Abstract Segregation involves more than one population group, and segregation measures quantify how different population groups are distributed across space. One of the key conceptual and methodological foundations of segregation studies is to account for the potential of spatial interaction among two or more population groups across areal units. This foundation implies the need for a spatial approach to portray the spatial (and thus social) interaction among neighbors. In general, simple percentages (for example, percent Black) are not a measure of segregation. Because local spatial segregation measures did not emerge until recently, the objectives of this article are threefold: (1) to explain a spatial approach for measuring the level of segregation at the neighborhood (or local) level, (2) to demonstrate the deficiencies of using a percentage of racial/ethnic group as a measure of segregation, and (3) to clarify the appropriateness of two commonly used indexes of dissimilarity and diversity. Data from St. Louis, Missouri, and Chicago, Illinois, are used to discuss these three points.