WWW.THESES.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Theses, dissertations, documentation
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 13 | 14 || 16 | 17 |   ...   | 56 |

«Moving to opportunity voluMe 14, nuMber 2 • 2012 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and Research ...»

-- [ Page 15 ] --

0.014 – 0.006 0.00 0.001 – 0.004 – 0.016 – 0.050 – 0.023 – 0.023 – 0.05 – 0.084 – 0.085 – 0.10 ~ – 0.094 – 0.116* – 0.15 – 0.160 – 0.20 – 0.192 – 0.191 – 0.202

–  –  –

These strategies all complemented the purer financial incentives that were offered to respondents and interviewers as motivations for behavior. The offer of the end-game incentive did not garner the expected response; the share of respondents who completed an interview was the same between those offered the original incentives and those offered the additional end-game incentives. Keeping the study in the field and refreshing interviewers with new types of incentives to offer to respondents did increase the ERR, because they motivated the interviewers to keep trying to locate and interview elusive and reluctant respondents.

The uneven number and slight variation in the quality of staffing across MTO sites led to differential completion rates and necessitated adjustments to the field procedures (using travelers to supplement local staff), and they also led to incremental implementation of the end-game activities.

The strategy of pushing for as-high-as-possible within-site ERRs (as opposed to focusing only on a high overall ERR) certainly put strain on study resources (imagine the cost savings of shutting down one or two sites early, for example) but also added value. The analysis of ITT estimates at different response rates is one marker of potential value, wherein MTO effects on psychological distress of adults and female youth are larger and more precise with the final ERR compared with results that would have been reported had the study stopped when the field reached lower ERRs.

–  –  –

Acknowledgments The authors thank the Institute for Social Research data collection staff—interviewers, trackers, team leaders, production coordinators, and production managers—for their tireless efforts and dedication to high-quality data collection on the Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing demonstration.

Authors Nancy Gebler is a survey director in the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan.

Lisa A. Gennetian is a senior research director of economic studies at The Brookings Institution.

Margaret L. Hudson is a survey specialist in the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan.

Barbara Ward is a survey director in the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan.

Matthew Sciandra is a research analyst at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

References American Association of Public Opinion Research. 2012. “AAPOR Best Practices.” http://www.

aapor.org/Best_Practices1.htm (accessed January 22).

Gennetian, Lisa A., Matthew Sciandra, Lisa Sanbonmatsu, Jens Ludwig, Lawrence F. Katz, Greg J. Duncan, Jeffrey R. Kling, and Ronald C. Kessler. 2012. “The Long-Term Effects of Moving to Opportunity on Youth Outcomes,” Cityscape 14 (2): 137–168.

Gouskova, Elena A. 2008. PSID Technical Report: The 2005 PSID Transition to Adulthood Supplement Weights. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Groves, Robert M., Floyd J. Fowler, Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, and Eleanor Singer.

2004. Survey Methodology, 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ludwig, Jens. 2012. “Guest Editor’s Introduction,” Cityscape 14 (2): 1–28.

Macintyre, Sally A., and Anne Ellaway. 2003. “Neighborhoods and Health: An Overview.” In Neighborhoods and Health, edited by Ichiro Kawachi and Lisa F. Berkman. New York: Oxford University Press: 20–42.

Orr, Larry, Judith D. Feins, Robin Jacob, Erik Beecroft, Lisa Sanbonmatsu, Lawrence F. Katz, Jeffrey

B. Liebman, and Jeffrey R. Kling. 2003. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program:

Interim Impacts Evaluation. Report prepared by Abt Associates Inc. and the National Bureau of Economic Research for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Cityscape 85Gebler, Gennetian, Hudson, Ward, and Sciandra

Sanbonmatsu, Lisa, Jens Ludwig, Larry F. Katz, Lisa A. Gennetian, Greg J. Duncan, Ronald C. Kessler, Emma Adam, Thomas W. McDade, and Stacy Tessler Lindau. 2011. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Final Impacts Evaluation. Report prepared by the National Bureau of Economic Research for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.

Sanbonmatsu, Lisa, Jordan Marvakov, Nicholas A. Potter, Fanghua Yang, Emma Adam, William J.

Congdon, Greg J. Duncan, Lisa A. Gennetian, Lawrence F. Katz, Jeffrey R. Kling, Ronald C. Kessler, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Jens Ludwig, and Thomas W. McDade. 2012. “The Long-Term Effects of Moving to Opportunity on Adult Health and Economic Self-Sufficiency,” Cityscape 14 (2): 109–136.

Weiss, Charlene, and Barbara A. Bailar. 2002. “High Response Rates for Low-Income Population In-Person Surveys.” In Studies of Welfare Populations: Data Collection and Research Issues, edited by Michele Ver Ploeg, Robert A. Moffitt, and Constance F. Citro. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press: 86–104.





86 Moving to Opportunity MTO: A Successful Housing Intervention Jennifer Comey Susan J. Popkin Kaitlin Franks Urban Institute Abstract At its core, Moving to Opportunity (MTO) was a housing intervention offering public housing families tenant-based vouchers to move to the private market. Giving families vouchers resulted in better quality housing for them 10 to 15 years later, potentially contributing to the physical and mental health improvements of those who participated in MTO. Using a triangulated, multisource strategy, we find that two-thirds of all MTO households still receive housing assistance. The Section 8 group experienced higher rates of doubling up, although the MTO intervention had no effect on housing cost burdens.

The experimental group experienced material hardship, making tradeoffs between paying their rent on time and paying utilities.

Introduction The research objective of the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) for Fair Housing demonstration was to test the long-term effect of moving families with children from public or project-based housing developments located in very low-income neighborhoods to subsidized private-market rental units in neighborhoods with low poverty levels. The hypothesis tested was that exposing families to low-poverty environments would result in improvements in their employment, income, education, health, and social well-being. Although it was also a larger social intervention, MTO was, at its core, a housing intervention offering families living in some of the worst public housing developments in the nation the opportunity to receive a tenant-based voucher and move to the private market. Most cities have extremely long waiting lists for housing assistance, particularly tenantbased vouchers, because need is greater than supply, which makes it difficult for those already in public housing to switch to using vouchers. The MTO lottery offered a rare opportunity for these residents to jump to the head of the line (Finkel and Buron, 2001; Turner and Kingsley, 2008).

–  –  –

The MTO demonstration’s experimental design (described in other articles in this symposium and in Sanbotmatsu, 2011) also makes comparing different forms of housing assistance possible. Currently, the federal government provides rental housing subsidies for very low-income households in two basic forms: project-based subsidies are attached to specific apartments or homes managed by public housing agencies (PHAs) or private owners, whereas tenant-based housing vouchers help pay the rent for homes and apartments on the private market (for more detail, see Turner and Kingsley, 2008). Over the years, vouchers have accounted for a growing share of all federal assistance to very low-income renters. Housing advocates and policymakers, however, continue to debate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches. MTO provides an opportunity to compare rigorously, all else being equal, the benefits for low-income families of living in subsidized projects as opposed to receiving vouchers or vouchers plus an incentive to locate in a low-poverty neighborhood. Note, however, that the subsidized projects targeted for participation in the MTO demonstration are not typical of all federally subsidized rental housing. By design, the targeted projects were located in high-poverty neighborhoods and suffered from physical deterioration and social distress.

Context for the MTO Demonstration In 1994, when MTO began, the public housing program had become a national symbol of the failures of social welfare programs. The grim highrise towers and sprawling barracks-style developments that dominated urban landscapes were a highly visible reminder of the crime, poverty, and other social ills afflicting many central city communities (Popkin et al., 2000). Many public housing properties were poorly constructed, badly managed, and inadequately funded, leading to extensive repair backlogs and putting residents at risk of injury or disease (Landrigan, Todd, and Wedeen, 1995; Manjarrez, Popkin, and Guernsey, 2007; Rosenstreich et al., 1997). Furthermore, these developments were often on undesirable urban renewal sites close to other types of subsidized housing, resulting in communities with high concentrations of racially and economically segregated, very low-income households (HUD, 1994; Turner, Popkin, and Rawlings, 2009).

MTO was a key element of the policy changes that began in the 1990s with the intention to transform public housing and use housing assistance to promote access to neighborhoods that offered greater social and economic opportunities for assisted tenants (Turner, Popkin, and Rawlings, 2009).

The largest component of this effort was the $6 billion federal HOPE VI Program, which provided large grants to housing authorities across the nation to demolish their most distressed developments and replace them with new, mixed-income housing (Popkin, Levy, and Buron, 2009).1 In all five MTO sites—Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City—the public housing developments were physically distressed and would have met the formal definition of substandard housing (NCSDPH, 1992; Scharfstein and Sandel, 1998). At baseline, participants reported extreme dissatisfaction with their housing and complained of problems such as vermin (rats, mice, and cockroaches), mold, and broken plumbing, all of which presented dangers to HOPE VI stands for Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere. The program began providing grants to housing authorities in 1993 (Popkin et al., 2000).

–  –  –

health and well-being. Nearly one-half of participants at baseline identified wanting a bigger or better apartment as a motivation for moving (Orr et al., 2003). Therefore, a key question for MTO is how this demonstration affected basic housing outcomes—housing quality, reliance on housing assistance, affordability, and homelessness.

How the MTO demonstration would affect housing outcomes overall was not clear at baseline.

Because of the nature of the voucher program and limits on Fair Market Rent (FMR), voucher holders tend to be concentrated in low-income communities where rents are affordable, vacancy rates are high, and quality is relatively low. MTO offered the experimental group participants (those who were offered a voucher that could be used only in census tracts with 1990 poverty rates of less than 10 percent and who received additional mobility counseling) the assistance to move to low-poverty neighborhoods that might theoretically offer access to better quality housing stock and more responsive landlords. Even with assistance, however, participants might have trouble navigating the private market, have difficulty leasing up or securing a unit, and encounter discrimination. In the long term, even those who initially were successful in finding a unit and leasing up might experience housing instability if they had to move because of changes in the rental market or problems with their landlords. Conversely, if MTO really helped participants improve their social and economic circumstances, they might earn their way off housing assistance, leaving them vulnerable to economic reversals.

As it turned out, in addition to the basic challenges of navigating the rental market with a voucher, the demonstration took place in the context of a rapidly changing housing market, during a period when the incomes of Americans with the lowest incomes declined (after adjusting for inflation) and housing markets became even more segregated by income and race (Briggs, Popkin, and Goering, 2010).

We begin this article briefly summarizing the key findings. Then we review the data sources and methodology used for analysis, describing in detail the new multisource triangulation method used to identify MTO participants’ housing assistance at the time of the final impacts evaluation (Sanbonmatsu et al., 2011). We review our findings regarding housing quality, homelessness and doubling up, housing costs and burdens, and housing payment challenges. We finish by considering the implications of the MTO demonstration and receiving vouchers in general.

Summary of Findings Originally, giving low-income families vouchers at the start of the demonstration resulted in better quality housing compared with that of the control group (participants who were not offered vouchers or counseling). This finding is consistent with research on the effect of HOPE VI redevelopment on outcomes for relocated residents (Popkin, Levy, and Buron, 2009). The public housing developments in the MTO demonstration were in such poor shape that participants both experienced immediate improvements (evidenced by the results from the interim survey [Orr et al., 2003]) and sustained them over the long term (evidenced by the final evaluation survey results). These improvements in housing quality could have very likely contributed to the improvements in the physical and mental health of MTO participants.

Cityscape 89Comey, Popkin, and Franks



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 13 | 14 || 16 | 17 |   ...   | 56 |


Similar works:

«Blackpool Safeguarding Adults Board Multi-Agency Safeguarding Policy & Procedures This document is divided into three parts – Part One – Policy This section of the document provides the scope and guiding principles of the procedures, definitions. Part Two– Procedures This section describes the actions required of individuals and organisations to respond to suspected or actual abuse of an adult at risk. Actions within the procedures should be informed by the policy. Part three Guidance...»

«Introduction Edward P. Lazear This book is an outgrowth of the desire at the Hoover Institution to focus on issues that are of essential policy relevance. Right now, few issues are more important in the United States than improving education. This introduction summarizes the key arguments made in the book’s essays. The summary is followed by a discussion of some of the key policy questions in education. More will be said on the nature of the book below, but let us get to the essence first....»

«INNOVATIONS AND CONTROVERSIES: INTERROGATING EDUCATIONAL CHANGE Interrogating Conceptions of “Vulnerable Youth” in Theory, Policy and Practice Kitty te Riele and Radhika Gorur (Eds.) Interrogating Conceptions of “Vulnerable Youth” in Theory, Policy and Practice INNOVATIONS AND CONTROVERSIES: INTERROGATING EDUCATIONAL CHANGE Volume 2 Series Editor: Roger Slee, The Victoria Institute, Victoria University, Australia Editorial Board: Michael Apple, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA...»

«Internal Party Democracy and Policy Formulation: Rationales, Trends, Relevance Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Lisbon 2009, Workshop 21 Promoting Internal Party Democracy: A Selling Point, A Serious Danger, Or a Redundant Exercise? Anika Gauja Department of Government and International Relations University of Sydney a.gauja@usyd.edu.au In this paper I examine the implementation and operation of internal party democracy (IPD) in eight political parties: the Australian Labor Party, the...»

«1 Improving the Validity of Contextualised Questions Ayesha Ahmed and Alastair Pollitt University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate Paper to be presented at the BERA Conference, Leeds, September 2001. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be taken as official policy of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate or any of its subsidiaries. Contact details Ayesha Ahmed, RED, UCLES, 1 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 2EU ahmed.a@ucles.org.uk...»

«Assessment of Policy Impacts on Sustainability in Europe D2.1 Report on new qualitative ex-post and ex-ante evaluation methods Grant Agreement no.: 283121 Project Acronym: APRAISE Instrument: Collaborative Project Theme: ENV.2011.4.2.1-1: Efficiency Assessment of Environmental Policy Tools Related to Sustainability Project coordinator: JIN Work Package 2 Leader Organisation: Fraunhofer ISI Prepared by: SEIT Main contributors: JIN, Fraunhofer ISI, JR, UoS, UPRC, NTUA, UL, SEIT Date of...»

«IIIEE Theses 2013:05 Responsible Investment Understanding and Improving ESG Engagement with Chinese Investee Companies Kei Yau Sin Supervisors Naoko Tojo Torbjörn Brorson Thesis for the fulfilment of the Master of Science in Environmental Sciences, Policy & Management Lund, Sweden, June 2013 MESPOM Programme: Lund University – University of Manchester University of the Aegean – Central European University Erasmus Mundus Masters Course in Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management MESPOM...»

«EMEA POLICY ADMINISTRATION SOLUTIONS PROPERTY & CASUALTY, GENERAL, AND SPECIALTY LINES VENDOR VIEW Craig Beattie October 2015 This authorized reprint contains material excerpted from a recent Celent report profiling and evaluating 43 different property & casualty/general insurance policy administration system vendors in EMEA. The full report is more than 260 pages long. This report was not sponsored by Sapiens in any way. This reprint was prepared specifically for Sapiens, but the analysis...»

«Durham E-Theses The fantastic in Spain during the latenineteenth and early-twentieth centuries Moffatt, Edward J. R.How to cite: Moffatt, Edward J. R. (1998) The fantastic in Spain during the latenineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4838/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal...»

«Toyota Vehicle Insurance Policy Contents INTRODUCTION KEY FEATURES AND BENEFITS YOUR PRODUCT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Product Disclosure Statement overview.5 Important information YOUR POLICY General Information What your policy consists of 21 day cooling off period Eligibility Driver eligibility Vehicle eligibility Area eligibility Our agreement with you Goods and services tax The privacy of your personal information. 10 Your promise to us If you have a concern Talk to us first Our internal...»

«American Politics Research http://apr.sagepub.com A Democratic Polity?: Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States Jeff Manza and Fay Lomax Cook American Politics Research 2002; 30; 630 DOI: 10.1177/153267302237231 The online version of this article can be found at: http://apr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/6/630 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for American Politics Research can be found at: Email Alerts:...»

«Bright Home Insurance Policy Summary This is a summary of the policy and does not contain the full terms and conditions of the cover, which can be found in the policy documentation. It is important that you read the policy documentation carefully when you receive it. One policy booklet covers all sections of this policy other than Family Professional Fees which is covered by a separate policy booklet. Who is the Insurer? The Insurer of all sections of this policy other than Family Professional...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.theses.xlibx.info - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.