FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 5 | 6 || 8 | 9 |   ...   | 28 |

«A Journal of Policy Development and Research HoPe VI Volume 12, Number 1 • 2010 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy ...»

-- [ Page 7 ] --

1998) and on the relative importance of “weak” or “bridging” ties in particular for accessing upward mobility opportunities (Granovetter, 1973; Putnam, 2000). Other social capital research has focused on aggregate levels of trust and civic engagement (Putnam, 2000), or has highlighted the informal social control that can be generated from social capital (Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls, 1997). Although definitions of social capital are widely debated (see Fulkerson and Thompson, 2008; Portes, 1998; Portes and Landolt, 2000), in this article we define social capital as the actual or potential resources that can be accessed through social relationships where TNR are established. Therefore, social ties and trust are not social capital but, rather, are the prerequisites for social capital.

The latest wave of “neighborhood effects” research has brought social capital and social networks to the forefront of numerous academic and policy discussions as a potential mechanism through which neighborhood disadvantage might be channeled. It has been argued that living in povertyconcentrated neighborhoods, for example, can shape the social capital resources to which one has access (Wilson, 1987). In neighborhoods where most residents are disadvantaged, marginalized, or disconnected from “mainstream” society, residents may have access to a limited set of information and opportunities through their social networks, compared with those who live in economically mixed or higher income neighborhoods. Thus, inadequate access to social capital has been added to a growing list of conditions characteristic of high-poverty neighborhoods (for example, poor housing quality, crime and social disorder, and pervasive joblessness) that put residents at a severe disadvantage for escaping poverty and achieving upward mobility. The idea that neighborhood demographics affect residents’ access to social capital has informed urban housing policies that seek to alter the demographic makeup in high-poverty neighborhoods. In countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands, creating mixed-income communities has become an explicit policy goal for urban redevelopment initiatives targeting highpoverty neighborhoods, partly due to the assumption that mixed-income environments are richer in trust, shared norms, and resourceful social networks. Mixed-income neighborhoods are thought to provide lower income people with greater opportunities to connect with people who adhere to “mainstream” norms of work and family and to tap into better job networks (Wilson, 1987).

–  –  –

Research and Literature This section reviews a number of empirical and theoretical studies that contribute to the present understanding of how neighborhoods can shape the development of residents’ social capital in an effort to understand how HOPE VI relocation might affect low-income residents’ access to social capital. This section first provides a brief review of the research on neighborhood population characteristics and social networks. Next, it turns to the literature that explores the role of neighborhood institutions before finally considering the contributions from research on trust, public familiarity, and stigma, which may help further the understanding of social capital development in a neighborhood context.

Wilson’s (1987) research suggests that poverty concentration at the neighborhood level can shape residents’ social networks by limiting everyday opportunities to interact and form relations with higher income people who have long-term attachments to the workforce. Some studies have proposed that residents in such communities are lacking “weak” or “bridging” ties to working- or middle-class people who have access to important information and resources necessary for upward mobility (Granovetter, 1973; Putnam, 2000). Some evidence indicates that people living in high-poverty communities have social networks that are more homogeneous and dense than the social networks of people living in low-poverty areas, suggesting that information on jobs and other opportunities may be more redundant in high-poverty neighborhoods (Dominguez and Watkins, 2003; Smith, 1995). Poor urban residents were often found to have insular and localized social networks that offered little opportunity for advancement (Tigges, Browne, and Green, 1998;

Wacquant and Wilson, 1989; Wilson, 1996, 1987). In his study of low-income Latino and AfricanAmerican youth, Briggs (1998) found that those who had wider and more diverse networks had more access to job information.

While our social worlds today are less likely to be bound by our neighborhoods of residence due to advancements in communication and transportation (Guest and Wierzbicki, 1999; Wellman, 2001), spatial proximity may still influence the development of social ties (Mok, Wellman, and Antonia-Carrasco, 2008; Wellman, 1996), particularly for lower income people who are more bound to a place due to limited resources (as well as those who have limited mobility, including elderly people and people with disabilities).1 Length of residence may also have a positive association with neighborhood-based social networks as people become more embedded in their communities and get to know their neighbors over time (Coleman, 1988; Saegert and Winkel, 2004).

Others, however, have pointed out that physical proximity to higher income people alone does not automatically translate into having helpful social ties (Curley, 2009), because factors such as social status (Lin and Dumin, 1986), trust, reputation, motivation, community context (Smith, 2005, 2007), pride, shame, and stigma (Blokland and Noordhoff, 2008) can complicate the mobilization Some studies have found that people with more education and higher incomes have larger and more geographically dispersed social networks, partly because they are less constrained by limited resources to travel (Fischer, 1982). Unemployed people, in contrast, tend to have more neighborhood-based social ties, because they depart the neighborhood less regularly (Fischer, 1982). Households with children are thought to have greater social capital because the members of the household typically spend more time in the community and have multiple avenues for connecting with people in the neighborhood (Kleinhans, Priemus, and Engbersen, 2007; Saegert and Winkel, 2004).

Cityscape 35Curley

of such ties. Further, social proximity may be more important than physical proximity, as people are drawn to others like themselves in terms of lifestyle, social status, and values (that is, “birds of a feather flock together”) (McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook, 2001). There is some evidence that ethnic diversity at the neighborhood level may have a negative association with local social relations, because residents in homogeneous communities may be more likely to trust their neighbors and be involved with their communities (Fischer, 1982; Putnam, 2007).

Although many questions remain about the effects of neighborhood poverty concentration on social networks and the relative importance of social versus physical proximity for local social ties, inquiry into what happens to low-income individuals’ networks when they relocate out of high-poverty areas is also growing. Attention to this issue was prompted with the development of programs across the United States and Europe designed to relocate poor people in an effort to deconcentrate poverty, create mixed-income neighborhoods, and improve the life chances of the poor. Two such programs in the United States—HOPE VI and MTO (Moving to Opportunity)— have relocated tens of thousands of low-income families from high-poverty communities in the past decade. By decreasing poverty concentration through relocation or redevelopment, it is assumed that lower income residents will be more exposed to higher income people and might diversify their social networks to include them. Few studies have provided evidence, however, that mixedincome programs (or relocation initiatives) improve low-income residents’ access to social capital.

In fact, studies on both sides of the Atlantic show little social mixing among higher and lower income people in redeveloped mixed communities (Brophy and Smith, 1997; Buron et al., 2002;

Curley, 2009; Kleinhans, 2004; Smith, 2002; van Beckhoven and van Kempen, 2003), suggesting that increased residential proximity does not necessarily promote social interaction. Others have similarly found that low-income movers tend not to receive job information from their new neighbors, challenging the assumption that higher income neighbors will become useful or willing job contacts or that altering neighborhood demographic composition will promote the development of social capital (Briggs et al., 2007; Curley, 2009; Kleit, 2001).2 In addition to the potential effect neighborhood population demographics may have on the development of trust and relations among neighbors, other neighborhood attributes may play a role as well, including physical structure of the neighborhood, its institutions and public spaces, and even neighborhood stigma. Although few studies have explored the explicit link between local institutions or other neighborhood features and social capital development in the context of a relocation program, a number of studies have suggested that neighborhood institutions are important for community stability, social control, collective efficacy, and social democracy. These studies are informative because they highlight the important role of local institutions and public spaces and provide a framework for understanding how neighborhoods may shape HOPE VI relocatees’ development of trust and social relations in their communities.

Although one study assessing the MTO program found that moving to a low-poverty neighborhood increased the chances that adults would have friends who graduated from college or earned more than $30,000 a year, only 8 percent of participants in the study found a job through a neighborhood tie, and no differences existed between those in high- and low-poverty neighborhoods (Kling, Liebman, and Katz, 2005; Orr et al., 2003). Further, HOPE VI researchers found that relocation often broke up strong social networks, which could reduce access to social support—another important form of social capital (Clampet-Lundquist, 2004; Curley, 2009; Greenbaum, 2002; Popkin, Levy et al., 2004; Saegert and Winkel, 1998).

–  –  –

For example, in The Truly Disadvantaged, Wilson (1987) emphasized the role local social institutions played in maintaining stability in urban neighborhoods. He argued that one consequence of the outmigration of the African American working and middle classes from American cities in the 1970s was the removal of an institutional base and the stability and social control it brought to those neighborhoods. As families from those urban neighborhoods left for the suburbs, so too did the businesses and services (for example, grocery stores, churches, banks, and restaurants) that catered to and were supported by them. The resulting lack of institutional stability compounded with the increasing concentration of economic deprivation created socially isolated communities with few resources to leverage political and economic investment.3 Sánchez-Jankowski’s (2008) ethnographic research similarly highlighted the ways in which local institutions such as beauty salons and “mom and pop” stores can play an important socialization function in poor neighborhoods and contribute to a sense of community, stability, and social order. Peterson, Krivo, and Harris (2000) also pointed to the importance of institutions: “When local organizations that link individuals to each other and to broader political and economic institutions are less prevalent, commitments to mainstream values are less likely to be encouraged, socialization to conformity is undermined, and the resulting indirect social control is weakened” (Peterson, Krivo, and Harris, 2000: 34). In multivariate analyses of census and crime data, they found that the presence of recreation centers reduced violent crime in areas with extreme economic deprivation, suggesting that such facilities and their programs may serve an important social control function (Peterson, Krivo, and Harris, 2000). Neighborhood institutions may promote mechanisms of informal social control by providing a venue for social interaction and for developing collective efficacy (Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls, 1997), which has been defined as the trust, shared expectations, and willingness to intervene in one’s community.4 Related to these mechanisms of social control is the ability of residents to realize their common values and goals. In Bowling Alone, Putnam (2000) raised alarm about the declining civic engagement of Americans and the implications of a weakened institutional base. He argued that declining participation in formal membership-based organizations, religious institutions, and politics (voting) was indicative of a broader trend of declining social capital, which he contended threatens the democratic and social fabric of our society.

While the previously discussed quantitative and qualitative studies highlight the important links between institutions and neighborhood stability, social control, and trust, only two known quantitative studies have documented a clear connection between neighborhood facilities and local social networks. These studies include those of Van Bergeijk, Bolt, and van Kempen (2008), who found Interestingly, however, Small and McDermott (2006) found that neighborhood poverty level had a positive relationship with the number of organizational resources in the neighborhood (such as grocery stores, pharmacies, and childcare centers). In another study, Small, Jacobs, and Massengill (2008) examined the interorganizational ties of childcare centers in New York and found that centers in high-poverty neighborhoods were better connected and had more referral and organizational ties, challenging the general belief that concentrated poverty weakens the capacity for strong, local organizations.

Small’s (2006) research also suggests that as “resource brokers” and as sites for social interaction, neighborhood institutions and their connections may play an important mediating role between neighborhood poverty and well-being.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 5 | 6 || 8 | 9 |   ...   | 28 |

Similar works:

«VOL. XX, PART I No. 4 x PROCEEDINGS NOVEMBER 24, ~933 POLICY LIMITS I N CASUALTY INSURANCE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS~ P A U L DORW~-ILER Insurance, in theory, should either cover the whole risk or that portion of the risk involving the larger potential losses, even though their occurrence is less probable. The current practice in most lines of casualty insurance is somewhat in conflict with this theory. Generally, the standard coverage for third party insurance involving injury to persons is based...»

«Salt Lake Community College Policies and Procedures Manual 3.01 Cabinet Approval: INTERNAL AUDIT Board of Trustees Approval: 11/13/2013 CHAPTER # 1 POLICY # 3.01 I. POLICY The Internal Audit Department assists Salt Lake Community College in accomplishing its objectives by providing an independent appraisal of risk management, internal controls, effectiveness, efficiency, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, rules, and procedures. Internal Audit maintains a comprehensive program of...»

«Heroes or Zeroes? The discursive positioning of ‘underachieving boys’ in English neo-liberal education policy Prof Becky Francis, Roehampton University Published in Journal of Education Policy, 21 (2) 187-200. Heroes or Zeroes? The discursive positioning of ‘underachieving boys’ in English neo-liberal education policy Abstract: The moral panic concerning ‘boys’ underachievement’ is well established in the UK and Australia, and is spreading to other countries. Feminists have...»

«Chapter 25 EVALUATION AS A MEDIUM OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GERMANY AND BEYOND by Dr. Stefan Kuhlmann Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe, Germany Introduction In Germany, the interest in the evaluation of S&T policies has increased markedly in recent years, mainly because of cut-backs in public budgets which put considerable pressure on the prioritising of financially effective state intervention. During the past two decades a...»

«THE CONTAINMENT OF HERITAGE: SETTING LIMITS TO THE GROWTH OF HERITAGE IN IRELAND Studies in Public Policy The series Studies in Public Policy is published by the Policy Institute at Trinity College. It aims to bridge the gap between the academic and professional policy communities and make a real difference to public policy debate in Ireland. Each Study takes a practical policy problem and analyses it in a way that is academically rigorous yet accessible for all that. Current Titles 1 Michael...»

«GENERAL TERMS AND Europe CONDITIONS Europe refers to the countries of the European Union, Switzerland, Norway or the Principality of Monaco. As with any insurance policy, there are reciprocal rights and obligations. It is governed by the French Insurance Code. Excess These rights and obligations are explained in the pages that Part of the compensation that you are follow. responsible for. PROVISIONS COMMON TO ALL COVERAGE Mainland France Mainland France refers to: mainland France and Corsica,...»

«FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE VOLUNTEERS Volunteers Part 150 Volunteer Services Program Chapter 1 Policy, Procedures, and Responsibilities for Volunteers 150 FW 1 1.1 What is the purpose of this chapter? This chapter establishes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) policies, procedures, and responsibilities for working with volunteers. 1.2 What is the scope of this chapter? This chapter applies to personnel working with individuals and groups who volunteer by dedicating their time and skills to...»

«2013 LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES GLOBAL RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES REPORT September 2013 IMF staff regularly produces papers proposing new IMF policies, exploring options for reform, or reviewing existing IMF policies and operations. The following documents have been released and are included in this package: The Staff Report on 2013 Low-Income Countries Global Risks and  Vulnerabilities Report, prepared by IMF staff and completed on September 6, 2013 for the Executive Board’s consideration on...»

«11 Gintaras Bagdonas* European Union Military Staff ** Relations between Intelligence Services and Policy Makers: An Analysis of challenges and their causes This article addresses the relations between intelligence services and political institutions in democratic countries and overviews the main causes of both challenges and the tensions between these issues. The purpose of this publication is to analyze the relations between intelligence services and political institutions of contemporary...»

«FITNESS CHECK (FC) ROADMAP Fitness Check of monitoring and reporting obligations in environment policy TITLE OF THE EVALUATION/FC – ENV.D.4 AND ENV.F.1 14 March 2016 LEAD DG DATE OF THIS RESPONSIBLE UNIT ROADMAP Fitness Check 09/2015 TYPE OF EVALUATION START DATE Interim PLANNED COMPLETION DATE Mixed 03/2017 PLANNING http://ec.europa.eu/smartregulation/evaluation/index_en.htm CALENDAR This indicative roadmap is provided for information purposes only and is subject to change. A. Purpose (A.1)...»

«A POLICY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR GMPLS OPTICAL NETWORKS Nathalie Rico*, Omar Cherkaoui** and Halima Elbiaze** *Universite de Montrial, **University of Quebec in Montreal, C.P. 8888, succ A, Montreal, H3C-3P8, Quebec, Canada, rico@info.uqam.ca, cherkaoui.omar@uqam.ca Abstract: This paper presents a policy-based management framework for GMPLSenabled optical networks. First, the (Automatie Switched Optical Networks) and GMPLS (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) architecture are...»

«February, 2014 BPC Policy Brief V. 4 N. 65 Policy Brief Solidarity Among Brothers? Brazil in Africa: trade, investment and cooperation Solidarity Among Brothers? Brazil in Africa: trade, investment and cooperation Policy Brief February, 2014 BPC Policy Brief V.4 N.65 PUC-Rio RECTOR Pe. Josafá Carlos de Siqueira SJ VICE-RECTOR Pe. Francisco Ivern Simó SJ VICE-RECTOR FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS Prof. José Ricardo Bergmann VICE-RECTOR FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS Prof. Luiz Carlos Scavarda do Carmo...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.theses.xlibx.info - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.