WWW.THESES.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Theses, dissertations, documentation
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 33 | 34 || 36 | 37 |   ...   | 66 |

«of the AM’s Brand, Corporate Identity and Reputation SIG INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SESSIONS Sessions chairs The main function of a session chair is to ...»

-- [ Page 35 ] --

Limitations Due to time limitations, our research did not incorporate consumer opinion. We consider this research no more than a preliminary step towards a bigger project; its continuation will include quantitative analysis, in addition to our current qualitative approach. We hope to explore the topic from different sectors, and to establish whether initials operate in different ways in specific market sectors. We also wish to approach various demographics of consumers, to capture their views and to establish cases of successful initial usage, and the reasons certain individuals may like them.

Originality/value As far as we are aware, this is the first systematic approach to the use of initials in brand names and logo design together. During our literature review we did not encounter another article with similar characteristics or one that furnished a practical guide and clear analysis of relative advantages and disadvantages. In addition, we believe that our approach constitutes an integrative one to marketing-AND-design, as well as to brand names-AND-logos. In other words, although there is some marketing literature about brand names and logos, these aspects are considered separately, not as indivisible brand elements (which is our point of view). In addition, there is extended literature about what a “good name” is; however, there are few references to the practical use of initials.

Keywordsinitials, brand names, brand logos, design

References Athaide, G.A. & Klink, R.R. (2012), Creating Global Brand Names: the use of sound symbolism, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 202-212.

Charmesson, H. (1988), The Name is the Game: How to Name a Company or a Product, Homewood: Dow-Jones-Irwin.

del Río, P., Vázquez, R. & Iglesias, V. (2001), The role of brand name in obtaining differential advantages, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 10 No. 7, pp. 452Henderson, P.W. & Cote, J.A. (1998), “Guidelines for selecting and modifying logos”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, April, pp. 14-30.

Hillenbrand, P., Alcauter, S., Cervantes, J. & Barrios, F. (2013), Better branding: brand names can influence consumer choice, Journal Of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 300-308.

Hynes, N. (2009), Colour and meaning in corporate logos: an empirical study, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 545-555.

Kapferer, J.-N. (1985), Réfléchissez au nom de votre société, Harvard L’Expansion, No. 38, pp. 104-118.

Keller, K. L. (2003), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Keler, K-L., Heckler, S. & Houston, M.J. (1998), The effects of brand name suggestiveness on advertising recall, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, pp. 48-57.

Klink, R.R. (2001), Creating meaningful new brand names: a study of semantics and sound symbolism”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 27-34.

Klink, R.R. (2003), Creating meaningful new brand names: the relationship between brand name and brand mark, Marketing Letters, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 143-157.

Koen, F. (1969), Verbal and Non-verbal Mediators in Recognition Memory for Complex Visual Stimuli, Office of Education Report, Washington DC.

Kohli, C.S. and Suri, R. (2000), “Brand names that work: a study of the effectiveness of different types of brand names”, Marketing Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 112-120.

Kohli, C.S., Suri, R. and Thakor, M. (2002), “Creating effective logos: insight from theory and practice”, Business Horizons, May-June, pp. 58- 64.

Kohli, C.S., Harich, K. R. & Leuthesser, L. (2005), Creating brand identity: a study of evaluation of new brand names, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, pp. 1506-1515.

MacInnis, D.J., Shapiro, S. & Mani, G. (1999), Enhancing brand awareness through brand symbols, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 26, pp. 601-608.

Middleton, A. (2004), “Death by Acronym”, Marketing Magazine, Vol. 109 No. 13, pp. 8-8.

Nelson, K.E. (1971), “Memory development in children: evidence from non-verbal tasks”, Psychonomic Science, Vol. 25, December, pp. 346-48.

Park, C.W., Eisingerich, A.B., Pol, G. & Park, J.W. (2013), The role of brand logos in firm performance, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, pp. 180-187.

Petty, R. (2008), Naming names: trademark strategy and beyond: part one – selecting a brand name, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 190-197.

Pittard, N., Ewing, M. & Jevons, C. (2007), Aesthetic theory and logo design: examining consumer response to proportions across cultures, International Marketing Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 457-473.

Robertson, Kim (1989), Strategically Desirable Brand Name Characteristics, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 61-71.

Schechter, A.H. (1993), Measuring the value of corporate and brand logos, Design Management Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 33-39.

Seifert, L.S. (1992), Pictures as means of conveying information, Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 119 No. 3, pp. 279-287.

Van den Bosch, C., de Jong, M. & Elwig (2005), How corporate visual identity supports reputation, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 108Blogs/webs http://www.typophile.com/node/100713 http://www.organistudios.com/acronym-logo-design-tulsa-maui http://www.gtgraphics.org/genericlogos.html http://branded4good.com/blog/6-biggest-issues-nonprofit-acronyms/ http://justcreative.com/2010/08/24/logo-design-mistakes/ http://www.thedesigncubicle.com/2008/11/strategies-for-choosing-a-memorable-brand-name/ http://www.wepushbuttons.com.au/business-and-the-web/acronyms-in-business/ http://brand-identity-essentials.com/100-principles/ Motivations to interact with brands on Facebook – Towards a typology of consumer-brand interactions Machado, Joana César Azar, Salim L.





Vacas de Carvalho, Leonor Mendes, Ana Purpose Social media has changed the communication landscape and online consumer behavior (Gironda and Korgaonkar, 2014). With consumers spending more and more time on social media, brand-related interactions and exposure to brand communications are increasingly taking place within this sphere. Thus, Facebook and other social media become key players for branding activities (Hutter et al, 2013). As a result, significant power has shifted from the brands directly to consumers (Cova and Dalli, 2009). While social media has been subject to an increasing number of studies, empirical research on consumer–brand interaction on Facebook is still needed, in particular research on consumer motivations for engaging with brands on social media. Understanding these motivations would provide brand managers a better understanding of their consumers. The aim of this research is to address this gap and provide additional insights to brand managers on how to adapt their approaches to increase consumers’ interaction with brands on Facebook. Therefore, this paper provides new insights about consumer–brand motivations to interact, as it distinguishes four types of consumers based on five consumer–brand motivations to interact, which we describe and discuss in relation to the intensity and the different types of interactions that consumers have with brand-related content on Facebook.

Theoretical BackgroundSocial networks – Facebook

Social media is a “group of internet based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0 that allow the creation and exchange of User Generated Content” (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010, p 61). Different forms of social media have been studied in previous research, namely social networking sites (SNS) such as Facebook (Moraes et al., 2014). Facebook brand fan pages are used for explicit brand communication and as a privileged interaction channel between the brand and the users, which should be utilized to increase engagement with the brand and deepen the relationship with customers (Jahn and Kunz, 2012).

Types of consumer interactions with brand fan pages on Facebook Consumers may have different types of interactions with brands via brand fan pages on Facebook. According to previous research, in order to measure interaction with a brand on Facebook, it is necessary to distinguish at least three levels of interaction, namely “likes”, “comments” and “shares” (Peters et al,2012). Hence, consumer engagement with the brand on Facebook is measured using indicators that are based on Facebook functionalities.

Previous research also suggests that, besides “likes” and “comments”, social media metrics should also include the number of “shares” (Camarero et al., 2014; Hoffman and Fodor, 2010). These items are usually combined to calculate an overall engagement metric, but a detailed view is critical for brands to understand if they have an appropriate distribution across these levels (Peters et al. 2012). Muntinga et al. (2011) introduced the behavioral construct Consumer Online Brand-Related Activity (COBRA). They point out that people can engage in multiple roles in social media, depending on their motivations and goals. They distinguished between three levels of consumer interaction: consuming, contributing and creating.

Motivations to interact with brands on Facebook In order to understand consumer motivations to interact with brands on Facebook, we consider a user-centric functionalist perspective on social media, and apply the uses and gratification (U&G) theory proposed by Katz (1959). According to U&G theory, people use media to satisfy various needs and achieve their goals. Motivations are understood here with reference to the gratifications sought, and what activates the goal-directed behavior (Pervin, 1989). From the literature on consumer–brand relationships on social networks (Jahn and Kunz, 2012), consumer usage of social networks (Curran and Lennon, 2011), consumer engagement in online communication activities on social networks (Shu and Chuang, 2011), consumer–brand interactions on social media (Rohm et al, 2013) and COBRAs (Daugherty et al, 2008; Muntinga et al, 2011), we identified the most important motivations associated with the use of social networks: social influence, search for information, entertainment, trust and reward.

Research Methodology Data collection and sample Data was collected through the administration of an online questionnaire (convenience sampling method). We obtained a convenience sample of 160 respondents (Facebook users).

Our sample was heterogeneous in terms of sex, age, education level and time respondents spent on Facebook.

Principle measures The five main motivations that could influence consumers’ interactions with brands on Facebook were all measured through multiple-item scales using a seven point scale. All the construct items, except for reward, were adapted from the work of Shu and Chuang (2011).

With respect to reward, the lack of a scale that could serve as a basis for measuring this motivation made us develop a two-item scale based on previous academic (Muntinga et al, 2011; Wang and Fesenmaier, 2003) and non-academic studies that have examined consumer interaction with brands in exchange for a fee (Baird and Parasnis, 2011). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses were conducted to assess the reliability and validity of the variables used in this study. Convergent and discriminant validities for the dimensions used for our cluster analysis were supported. We had no common method bias.

–  –  –

Findings and Implications The objective of this analysis was to explore the different types of consumers who interact with brands using the five dimensions developed above. Therefore, we sorted the consumers into homogeneous clusters using cluster analysis techniques. We used hierarchical clustering methods in the exploratory approach. In order to further refine the cluster solution, we applied a non-hierarchical method to the resulting solution. Building on the five motivation factors for consumers to interact with brands on Facebook, the classification revealed four different groups of consumers with heterogeneous levels of motivation factors. Our findings provide support for the internal and external validity of the four-cluster solution. Based on the relevant cluster means associated with the five motivational dimensions, we attributed different names to each cluster. Additionally, we used other behavioral variables and demographic variables to profile the clusters.

“Brand detached” Our findings highlight a group of “brand detached” consumers, who have the lowest level of online interaction with the brand even when they are invited to interact with it. They spend less than one hour on Facebook per day on average, and connect to Facebook using their computers and tablets. For this group, the online presence of the brand is not important, and therefore they usually do not like, comment on or share the brand’s posts on Facebook. Thus, the “brand detached” consumers tend to assume a more “voyeuristic” behavior. Even though they do not usually like, comment on or share content, “brand detached” consumers do consume brand-related content, especially content that uses humor or that appeals to emotions.

“Brand profiteers” These consumers spend an average of between 30 minutes and two hours on Facebook per day, using their computers and their mobile phones. Even though they consider it highly important for brands to have Facebook pages, they only have a medium level of interaction with brands on Facebook. They do not spend time commenting on the brand’s posts. Indeed, they are mainly looking for good deals. Hence, “brand profiteers” are particularly susceptible to promotions and incentives, which are their primary motivations to interact with brands on Facebook.

“Brand companions” These consumers tend to devote a significant amount of their spare time to Facebook, spending more than two hours on Facebook per day on average. Even though they spend a significant amount of their time online, and they believe that it is highly important for a brand to have a page on Facebook, they only have a medium level of interaction with brands online. When they do interact, it is mainly due to a personal approach, since they rarely respond to brands’ calls for interaction (low level). For them, interacting with a brand is important for fun, and above all to get in contact with other users and with their friends.

“Brand companions” Brand companions are more responsive to symbolic content that appeals to their emotions.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 33 | 34 || 36 | 37 |   ...   | 66 |


Similar works:

«Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales A Review by Sir Bill Jeffrey May 2014 Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales Review by Sir Bill Jeffrey This information is also available at : www.justice.gov.uk Independent criminal advocacy in England and Wales Contents Introduction 3 Summary and Main Conclusions 5 1. The landscape of criminal advocacy 14 2. Quality 21 3. Training 26 4. Reflections on quality and training 30 5. The market in defence criminal advocacy 35 6. The...»

«www.natureswayresources.com BROWN PATCH and TAKE-ALL PATCH Warning Signs It is extremely well documented that Brown Patch is caused by the soil borne fungus (Rhizoctonia solani) and Take-All Patch is caused by the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis both of which thrive in unhealthy soils BROWN PATCH: Symptoms include yellowish grass with a grayish ring of wilted grass at the edges of the patch, several inches to many feet across. Grass blades will easily pull off of stolons in the...»

«Conjugacy of finite subsets in hyperbolic groups Martin R. Bridson∗ and James Howie† Abstract There is a quadratic-time algorithm that determines conjugacy between finite subsets in any torsion-free hyperbolic group. Moreover, in any k-generator, δ-hyperbolic group Γ, if two finite subsets A and B are conjugate, then x−1 Ax = B for some x ∈ Γ with x less than a linear function of max{ γ : γ ∈ A ∪ B}. (The coefficients of this linear function depend only on k and δ.) These...»

«ASPA Merit Process Leader’s Guide Table of Contents Introduction Principles Supporting the ASPA Merit Process Effective Equitable Accountable and Transparent Engaging and Affirming Flexible The ASPA Merit Process Eligibility Merit Distribution Merit Amount Calculation Roles in the ASPA Merit Process College and Administrative Leaders Role Decision-Makers Role Decision-Making Options Unit Leader (Dean/Director/AVP) Management Team Unit Leader and Management Team Documents Required to Recommend...»

«176 DeVries BIOTROPICA 34(1): 176–181 2002 Differential Wing Toughness in Distasteful and Palatable Butterflies: Direct Evidence Supports Unpalatable Theory1 Key words: Nymphalidae; butterfly palatability; wing toughness; wing patterns; predator defenses. IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT NOT ALL BUTTERFLY SPECIES are equally acceptable food items to bird predators; some are readily eaten, while others may be rejected presumably due to their nasty taste (Poulton 1902; Swynnerton 1915a, b, 1919; Chai...»

«A PROPOSAL OF CATEGORISATION FOR ANALYSING INDUCTIVE REASONING María C. Cañadas and Encarnación Castro We present an analysis of the inductive reasoning of twelve Spanish secondary students in a mathematical problem-solving context. Students were interviewed while they worked on two different problems. Based on Polya´s steps and Reid’s stages for a process of inductive reasoning, we propose a more precise categorization for analyzing this kind of reasoning in our particular context. In...»

«909 Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change: The Effect of Membership Change on U.S. Supreme Court Justices Scott R. Meinke Kevin M. Scott Understanding the source of voting changes by appellate judges provides an important window into the factors that shape the votes of the judges more generally. We argue that membership changes, by altering the collegial context in which judges make their choices, affect the information environment, long-term collegial considerations, and short-term...»

«BRITISH MINING No.82 MASHAMSHIRE COLLIERIES by LESLIE OWEN TYSON MONOGRAPH OF THE NORTHERN MINE RESEARCH SOCIETY APRIL 2007 CONTENTS Page Introduction 6 Acknowledgements 6 General Background 7 Geology 7 Historical Background 8 Jervaulx Abbey at Colsterdale 9 The Danby Family 11 End of the Scropes of Masham and Upsall 12 Second Sir Christopher Danby 13 The First Sir Thomas Danby 14 Christopher Danby 16 The first dispute at Gollinglith 17 The second Sir Thomas Danby 19 Thomas Danby Murder and...»

«7 Conjugated Polymers The large majority of polymers, first of all the broadly used commodity materials polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(ethylene terephthalate) or polystyrene, have similar electrical and optical properties: They are insulators and they are colorless, i.e., they possess no mobile charges and the lowest electronic excitations are in the UV region. There exists a peculiar class of polymers with quite different properties; these are polymers with conjugated double bonds in the...»

«In Praise of the Versatile Staysail 1 Cruising Sails: In Praise of the Versatile Staysail By Carol Hasse (Originally published in Cruising World Magazine, May 2002) I wasn’t too many miles into a voyage from Costa Rica to the Galapagos on board a Jim Brown Searunner trimaran before I’d fallen in love with our staysail. It was the handiest and most versatile of all the sails in our inventory, a breeze to tack or jibe, and quite easy to set or strike even though (and in part because) it...»

«Operating Manual Wideband Power Sensor R&S NRP-Z81 1137.9009.02 R&S NRP-Z85 1411.7501.02 R&S NRP-Z86 1417.0109.40/.44 Test and Measurement 1172.9530.12-071 Dear Customer, R&S® is a registered trademark of Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG Trade names are trademarks of the owners. 1172.9530.12-072 Basic Safety Instructions Always read through and comply with the following safety instructions! All plants and locations of the Rohde & Schwarz group of companies make every effort to keep the...»

«Drip Irrigation ForThe Mojave Desert October, 2007 Produced by the Conservation District of Southern Nevada Written/Editted by Joseph Fortier ASIC, CID, CIC, CGIA, CLIA and Kimberly Vilt Funding for this project was provided by the Bureau of Reclamation Thank you to the following individuals and organizations for their contributions and thoughtful edits: Judy Currier, Jennifer Szwejbka, Jon Wardlaw, Teri Knigh and High Desert RC&D, Tina Mullis, Shelly WalkerSalco Products, Chris Abbott-Toro...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.theses.xlibx.info - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.