«Contents Key dates 1. Topics 2. Science & research content of the programme 3. Call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’ 4. Criteria for selection 4.1. ...»
EWEA 2016 Annual Conference,
27-30 September 2016, Hamburg Conference Centre, Hamburg, Germany
Abstracts submission kit
Science and Research track
Science & research content of the programme
Call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’
Criteria for selection
Pre-submission and integration into regular sessions
Rules and requirements
Pre-submission of breakthrough abstracts
Online submission procedure
Using the online system
What do I need before starting my submission?
Advice for abstract submitters: how to write a good abstract
Abstract scoring procedure
Scoring of science & research abstracts
Recommendations made by abstract reviewers
What happens after the abstracts are scored?
Conference programme questions?
Contact Mia Magazin EWEA 2016 Conference Secretariat +32 2 213 18 07 email@example.com
2. Topics The conference sessions at EWEA Annual Conference 2016 will be built around the best abstracts received under the topics listed below. The number of sessions on each topic will be determined by the number and quality of abstracts received. The number of sessions foreseen for each topic will be confirmed at the programme meeting, along with the results of the abstract review process.
The EWEA Annual Conference focus is on applications relevant to the wind energy industry. Basic-researchoriented papers should preferably be directed to the conference “The Science of Making Torque from Wind” (TORQUE 2016), organized under the auspices of the European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE) (www.torque2016.org). Abstracts can be submitted for TORQUE 2016 until 29 February 2016.
3. Science & research content of the programme Science & research content in EWEA 2016 will again be organised in cooperation with the European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE), a world-leading wind energy academic & research community. The Academy will bring EWEA 2016 delegates leading edge wind energy research results, keeping Europe in the forefront of wind energy innovation. This offers a forum for in-depth presentations and discussions on progress and results of wind-energy related scientific research.
Once the two types of abstract have been reviewed under their respective processes, the two topics leaders will together decide how best to organise the content they have selected in the sessions they have available.
The scope of science & research work that will be selected for presentation should focus on applications relevant to the wind energy industry, including the direct application of R&D results and tools. Basicresearch-oriented papers should be directed to the conference “The Science of Making Torque from Wind” (TORQUE 2016), organized under the auspices of the European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE).
Science & research abstracts must describe work that has been done at the moment of submission, not work that will be done. The style of writing may be brief and incomplete, as long as the essential steps in the research are clear and convincing. It should contain new work, not yet published and should not describe work presented at other conferences. It should contain a complete reference list that is not included in the word count given on the website.
Science & research full papers of oral presentations will be published in EWEA 2016 Scientific Proceedings that will be made accessible to conference participants, speakers and other interested individuals.
4. Call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’ In response to feedback from members we will hold a call for contributions presenting the very latest findings and breakthroughs that have never been made public before. This was carried out for the first time at EWEA OFFSHORE 2015 and repeated at EWEA 2015.
This call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’ will take place from 6 to 19 June 2016. Both ‘general’ as well as ‘science & research’ submissions are encouraged on all the topics listed above. Submissions will be reviewed according to the same process used for the main abstract review before the summer, with the best being selected for presentation. Breakthrough abstracts not selected for an oral presentation and of sufficient standard will be offered the opportunity to be presented as posters.
4.1. Criteria for selection Those interested should bear in mind that this should not be considered as a ‘second chance’ for those that missed 17 April deadline for the main call for abstracts. Only abstracts that propose to share breakthroughs that would have been impossible to fully submit in April will be considered.
A breakthrough abstract should present findings that have never been presented before.
The data should not have been published before the EWEA annual conference.
The abstract should feature an element of real novelty (i.e. new technology, new methodology, new high-quality data, high-impact results that challenge the status quo/common assumptions and open new perspectives) Overtly promotional / commercial presentations will be discarded.
4.2. Pre-submission and integration into regular sessions Based on the experience gathered at EWEA OFFSHORE 2015 and EWEA 2015, where selected breakthrough abstracts were set aside for a dedicated session, we will try to facilitate integration of breakthrough content into regular sessions. To this end, we will introduce the possibility to declare your intention of submitting a breakthrough abstract in advance, as part of the regular call for abstracts, by using a pre-submission form.
This will enable the programme committee to anticipate what might be coming, and setting aside slots for a breakthrough presentation.
Space for a dedicated session for breakthrough content will still be reserved provisionally, and based on presubmissions, EWEA will then decide whether to have a separate session for breakthrough content or full integration into regular sessions. This decision will be taken by the end of May.
5. Rules and requirements
5.1. Definitions Submitter: person who submits the abstract Presenting author: person who will physically present the abstract at the conference and who is marked as the presenter in the programme
5.2. Submission rules Abstracts must be submitted online, on or before the closing date (17 April 2016 for the main call for abstracts, 19 June 2016 for the call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’). N.B. No extensions will be made to these deadlines.
The organisers reserve the right to reject any abstract that fails to comply with the submission instructions described in the document. Please note that late submissions will not be considered.
It is possible to submit more than one abstract. However, only one presenting author per abstract is permitted. Whilst it is possible for one presenter to have several poster presentations, please be aware that in order to promote as diverse a programme as possible it is not normally possible for a presenter to make more than one oral presentation.
Please ensure that your abstract does not contain spelling, grammatical or technical / scientific errors. Take care to not include special characters (symbols such as © or ± for example) as these will not be rendered properly, but rather write these out in normal text. No corrections are possible after the submission deadline. The abstract will be reproduced exactly as submitted. No proofreading will be done.
Presenting authors must accept full responsibility for the submission and presentation of the abstract. Presenting authors retain full copyright of their abstracts, presentations and full papers.
By submitting an abstract, authors give consent and authorise the organisers to publish or submit for publication their abstract, presentation, biography, photo and full paper, and to include them in any conference publications.
6. Online submission procedure
6.1. Using the online system Abstracts may only be submitted via our online system. The first time you use the system, you must create your own submitter account. Using this account, you are able to create, edit and submit
multiple abstracts. Submitters can go back and make changes to, or delete, a submitted abstract until the submission deadline, 17 April 2016 (23:00 CET) for the main call for abstracts and 19 June 2016 (23:00 CET) for the call for ‘breakthrough abstracts’.
Prior to the submission deadline, the secretariat will be in contact with abstract submitters. Once this deadline has passed, all future communication will be with the presenting author. To avoid confusion please make sure this is clearly communicated between submitters and presenting authors.
If you have successfully submitted your abstract you will receive a confirmation email. If no confirmation email is received within 48 hours, the abstract cannot be considered as successfully submitted and accepted. Please contact the secretariat at firstname.lastname@example.org to check
the status of your abstract. Abstract withdrawal: If you would like to withdraw an abstract after the submission deadline, please contact us at email@example.com
6.2. What do I need before starting my submission?
Read through the topic descriptions before you write and submit your abstract.
Prepare your abstract text in a word processing programme (e.g. Microsoft Word) for easy copypaste into the online form.
Prepare your brief biography (max 100 words). Biographies should summarise your current position, educational qualifications, brief career details and major work achievements to date, including any areas of specialisation. Biographies should be written in the third person and should be clear and concise. If your abstract is selected for presentation at the conference, your biography will be published as is in the online conference programme and will not be proofread.
Make sure you have a professional photo, head and shoulder style, JPEG format, sized at least 450 × 450 pixels and no larger than 2MB. If your abstract is selected for presentation at the conference, your professional photo will be published in the online conference programme.
Have information on co-authors, if applicable (full name, organisation and email address).
7. Advice for abstract submitters: how to write a good abstract An abstract is a short document that is intended to capture the interest of the reviewers. It should engage the reader, making it clear what your paper is about and why it would make an excellent oral or poster presentation.
When answering a call for abstracts keep the following in mind to ensure that yours has a good chance of being accepted.
Read the explanation of the abstract scoring process, so you understand the criteria your abstract will be marked on.
Ensure that your ideas are well thought out and follow a logical, coherent flow:
State the issue to be discussed Give a brief background to the issue Brief description of what you are doing to address it Implications/outcomes: why is what you’ve done of value to other specialists?
Ensure that the abstract relates to the topic in a direct, not contrived way.
Ensure your abstract will contribute to the conference:
Highlight why your work is innovative – what new ideas/research will you bring to delegates?
How is your work relevant to delegates? What will they learn and what can they take back to their jobs?
Title: Short attention-catching titles are the most effective. However, it is also important, for a conference paper, to ensure that the title describes the subject you are writing about, so make sure it’s not too obscure. Avoid using acronyms in your title.
Ensure that practical aspects of the abstract comply with requirements, including word limits, specified font type, size and format.
Look at past abstracts/conference papers to pick up the tone and style of successful abstracts.
Run your abstract past someone familiar with both the topic and this type of abstract process.
Finally, remember that your abstract serves two purposes:
To interest and intrigue the committee so they will select it Introduce/outline your topic for the online programme – to give delegates a good idea of what to expect
8. Abstract scoring procedure
8.1. Scoring of science & research abstracts
Reviewers of science & research abstracts will base their scores on the following criteria:
1 = the abstract has to describe work that has been done at the moment of writing the extended abstract, not work that will be done.
2 = while the style of writing may be brief and incomplete, the essential steps in the research must be clear and convincing.
3 = the abstract should contain new work, not yet published.
4 = the abstract should include a complete reference list.
5 = the methodology and results should be plausible and free of errors.
6 = the work in the abstract should be up-to-date as regards previous knowledge and the contribution of others.
7 = the work should be scientifically/technically relevant.
For each criterion, the abstract will be marked from 1 – 3, giving a maximum score of 21. Each abstract is reviewed by a number of different reviewers, and the average score out of 21 is calculated.
The 1-3 scale for each criterion is:
1 = not sufficient 2 = adequate 3 = good
8.2. Recommendations made by abstract reviewers As well as providing a numerical score for your abstract, each reviewer will make a recommendation. The
options available to reviewers are: