FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 43 |

«Chief Executive‟s Report 9 Summary Operating and Financial Overview Directors‟ Report 15 Corporate Governance Report Report of the Remuneration ...»

-- [ Page 20 ] --

European Commission. The European Commission is in the process of introducing an updated legislative package to its ―single European sky policy,‖ called ―SES2+‖, which would lead to changes to air traffic management and control within the EU. The ―single European sky policy‖ currently consists of the Framework Regulation (Reg. (EC) No. 549/2004) plus three technical regulations on the provision of air navigation services, organization and use of the airspace and the inter-operability of the European air traffic management network. These regulations have recently been amended by the so-called ―Single European Sky II‖ regulation (EU Regulation 1070/09), which focused on air traffic control (―ATC‖) performance and extended the authority of EASA to include Airports and Air Traffic Management. The objective of the policy is to enhance safety standards and the overall efficiency of air traffic in Europe, as well as to reduce the cost of air traffic control services.

On September 6, 2005, the European Commission announced new guidelines on the financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines by regional airports based on its February 2004 finding in the Charleroi case, a decision that the EU Court of First Instance (―CFI‖) has since annulled in December 2008. The guidelines only apply to publicly owned regional airports, and place restrictions on the incentives that these airports can offer airlines to deliver traffic. Ryanair believes that the CFI‘s annulment of the Charleroi decision severely undermines these guidelines. In April 2014, the European Commission published final revised guidelines that better reflect the commercial reality of the liberalized air transport market, but still place restrictions on the incentives public airports can offer to airlines delivering traffic, when compared with the commercial freedom available to private airports.

The European Union also adopted legislation on airport charges (EU Directive 2009/12), which was originally intended to address abusive pricing at monopoly airports. However, the legislation includes all European airports with over five million passengers per year. Management believes that this will likely increase the administrative burdens on smaller airports and may lead to higher airport charges, while the scope that exists within this Directive to address abuses of their dominant positions by Europe‘s larger airports is very limited.

See ―Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party Transactions Other Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsEU State Aid-Related Proceedings.‖ The European Union also passed legislation calling for increased transparency in airline fares, which requires the inclusion of all mandatory taxes, fees, and charges in advertised prices. Ryanair currently includes this information in its advertised fares in all markets where it operates. However, certain regulatory authorities have alleged that some fees applied by airlines, including Ryanair, on an avoidable basis are in fact mandatory.

Ryanair amended its website to include information on fees in June 2012 and incorporated further changes to meet these requirements on its website in August 2012 and December 2012.

Registration of Aircraft

Pursuant to the Irish Aviation Authority (Nationality and Registration of Aircraft) Order 2002 (the ―Order‖), the IAA regulates the registration of aircraft in Ireland. In order to be registered or continue to be registered in Ireland, an aircraft must be wholly owned by either (i) a citizen of Ireland or a citizen of another member state of the EU having a place of residence or business in Ireland or (ii) a company registered in and having a place of business in Ireland and having its principal place of business in Ireland or another member state of the EU and not less than two-thirds of the directors of which are citizens of Ireland or of another member state of the EU. As of the date of this report, nine of the ten directors of Ryanair Holdings are citizens of Ireland or of another member state of the EU. An aircraft will also fulfill these conditions if it is wholly owned by such citizens or companies in combination. Notwithstanding the fact that these particular conditions may not be met, the IAA retains discretion to register an aircraft in Ireland so long as it is in compliance with the other conditions for registration under the Order. Any such registration may, however, be made subject to certain conditions. In order to be registered, an aircraft must also continue to comply with any applicable provisions of Irish law. The registration of any aircraft can be cancelled if it is found that it is not in compliance with the requirements for registration under the Order and, in particular: (i) if the ownership requirements are not met; (ii) if the aircraft has failed to comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by the IAA in relation to the aircraft or aircraft of a similar type; or (iii) if the IAA decides in any case that it is not in the public interest for the aircraft to remain registered in Ireland.

Regulation of Competition

Competition/Antitrust Law. It is a general principle of EU competition law that no agreement may be concluded between two or more separate economic undertakings that prevents, restricts or distorts competition in the common market or any part of the common market. Such an arrangement may nevertheless be exempted by the European Commission, on either an individual or category basis. The second general principle of EU competition law is that any business or businesses having a dominant position in the EU common market or any substantial part of the common market may not abuse such dominant position. Similar competition laws apply at national level in EU member states. Ryanair is subject to the application of the general rules of EU competition law as well as specific rules on competition in the airline sector.

An aggrieved person may sue for breach of EU competition law in the courts of a member state and/or petition the European Commission for an order to put an end to the breach of competition law. The European Commission also may impose fines and daily penalties on businesses and the courts of the member states may award damages and other remedies (such as injunctions) in appropriate circumstances.

Competition law in Ireland is primarily embodied in the Competition Act 2002. This Act is modeled on the EU competition law system. The Irish rules generally prohibit anti-competitive arrangements among businesses and prohibit the abuse of a dominant position. These rules are enforced either by public enforcement (primarily by the Competition Authority) through both criminal and civil sanctions or by private action in the courts. These rules apply to the airline sector, but are subject to EU rules that override any contrary provisions of Irish competition law. Ryanair has been subject to an abuse-of-dominance investigation by the Irish Competition Authority in relation to service between Dublin and Cork. The Competition Authority closed its investigation in July 2009 with a finding in favor of Ryanair.

State Aid. The EU rules control aid granted by member states to businesses on a selective or discriminatory basis. The EU Treaty prevents member states from granting such aid unless approved in advance by the EU. Any such grant of state aid to an airline is subject to challenge before the EU or, in certain circumstances, national courts. If aid is held to have been unlawfully granted it may have to be repaid by the airline to the granting member state, together with interest thereon. See ―Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Related to the Company—The Company Is Subject to Legal Proceedings Alleging State Aid at Certain Airports‖ and ―Item 8. Financial InformationOther Financial InformationLegal Proceedings.‖

Environmental Regulation

Aircraft Noise Regulations. Ryanair is subject to international, national and, in some cases, local noise regulation standards. EU and Irish regulations have required that all aircraft operated by Ryanair comply with Stage 3 noise requirements since April 1, 2002. All of Ryanair‘s aircraft currently comply with these regulations. Certain airports in the U.K. (including London Stansted and London Gatwick) and continental Europe have established local noise restrictions, including limits on the number of hourly or daily operations or the time of such operations.

Company Facilities. Environmental controls are generally imposed under Irish law through property planning legislation, specifically the Local Government (Planning and Development) Acts of 1963 to 1999, the Planning and Development Act 2000 and regulations made there under. At Dublin Airport, Ryanair operates on land controlled by the DAA. Planning permission for its facilities has been granted in accordance with both the zoning and planning requirements of Dublin Airport. There is also specific Irish environmental legislation implementing applicable EU directives and regulations, to which Ryanair adheres. From time to time, noxious or potentially toxic substances are held on a temporary basis within Ryanair‘s engineering facilities at Dublin Airport, Glasgow (Prestwick), London (Stansted), Frankfurt (Hahn), Stockholm (Skavsta), Oslo (Rygge) and Kaunas. However, at all times Ryanair‘s storage and handling of these substances complies with the relevant regulatory requirements. At Ryanair‘s Glasgow (Prestwick) and London (Stansted) maintenance facilities, all normal waste is removed in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act of 1996 and Duty of Care Waste Regulations. For special waste removal, Ryanair operates under the Special Waste Regulations 1998. At all other facilities Ryanair adheres to all local and EU regulations.

Ryanair’s Policy on Noise and Emissions. Ryanair is committed to reducing emissions and noise through investments in ―next generation‖ aircraft and engine technologies and the implementation of certain operational and commercial decisions to minimize the environmental impact of its operations. According to the Air Travel Carbon and Energy Efficiency Report published by Brighter Planet, Ryanair is the industry leader in terms of environmental efficiency, and the Company is constantly working towards improving its performance.

In December 2005, Ryanair completed the fleet replacement program it commenced in 1999. All of Ryanair‘s older Boeing 737-200A aircraft were replaced with Boeing 737-800 ―next generation‖ aircraft, and Ryanair now operates a single-aircraft-type fleet of Boeing 737-800 ―next generation‖ aircraft with an average age of just over 5.5 years. The design of the new aircraft is aimed at minimizing drag, thereby reducing the rate of fuel burn and noise levels. The engines are also quieter and more fuel-efficient. Furthermore, by moving to an all Boeing 737-800 ―next generation‖ fleet, Ryanair reduced the unit emissions per passenger due to the inherent capacity increase in the Boeing 737-800 aircraft. The Boeing 737-800 ―next generation‖ aircraft have a significantly superior fuel-burn to passenger-kilometer ratio than Ryanair‘s former fleet of Boeing 737-200A aircraft. See ―—Aircraft‖ above for details on Ryanair‘s fleet plan.

Ryanair has also installed winglets on all of its existing aircraft and all future aircraft will also be fitted with winglets. Winglets reduce both the rate of fuel burn and carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 4% and also reduce noise emissions.

In addition, Ryanair has distinctive operational characteristics that management believes are helpful to

the general environment. In particular, Ryanair:

 operates with a high-seat density of 189 seats and an all-economy configuration, as opposed to the 162 seats and two-class configuration of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft used by traditional network airlines, reducing fuel burn and emissions per seat-kilometer flown;

 has reduced per-passenger emissions through higher load factors;

 better utilizes existing infrastructure by operating out of underutilized secondary and regional airports throughout Europe, which limits the use of holding patterns and taxiing times, thus reducing fuel burn and emissions and reducing the need for new airport infrastructure;

 provides direct services as opposed to connecting flights, in order to limit the need for passengers to transfer at main hubs and thus reduces the number of take-offs and landings per journey from four to two, reducing fuel burn and emissions per journey;

 has no late-night departures of aircraft, reducing the impact of noise emissions; and  is currently evaluating the benefits of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, a variant of the 737, with new more fuel-efficient engines.

Emissions Trading. On November 19, 2008, the European Council of Ministers adopted legislation to add aviation to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme as of 2012. This scheme, which has thus far applied mainly to energy producers, is a cap-and-trade system for CO2 emissions to encourage industries to improve their CO 2 efficiency. Under the legislation, airlines were granted initial CO2 allowances based on historical ―revenue ton kilometers‖ and a CO2 efficiency benchmark. Any shortage of allowances has to be purchased in the open market and/or at government auctions. Management believes that this legislation is likely to have a negative impact on the European airline industry. Ryanair takes its environmental responsibilities seriously and intends to continue to improve its environmental efficiency and to minimize emissions. Under Regulation 7 of The UK Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors‘ Report) Regulations 2013, Ryanair is obliged to state its annual quantity of emissions in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Ryanair‘s EU Emissions Trading Scheme monitoring, reporting and allowance surrender obligations are mandated on a calendar year basis. For calendar year 2013, Ryanair emitted 7,649,120 tCO2, which equates to 0.094 tCO2 per passenger.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 43 |

Similar works:

«Resident Handbook Welcome aboard! Fall 2015Spring 2016 East Carolina University Campus Living Table of Contents Who’s Who Page 4 A quick overview of the campus living staff and how they can help you. Respect and Courtesy Page 6 The East Carolina University Creed emphasizes our commitment to diversity and spirit of courtesy and respect for the rights of all individuals within the campus community. Living with a Roommate Page 8 A guide to help you better communicate and get along with your...»

«http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/csci.2013.14.1.129 Computer Science • 14 (1) 2013 Małgorzata Wielgus Przemysław Dąbek Roman Janusz Tomasz Kowal Wojciech Turek ERLANG-BASED SOFTWARE UPDATE PLATFORM FOR MOBILE DEVICES Abstract Growing computational power of mobile devices modifies existing approaches to data processing in large-scale sensor networks. Since sensors are no longer limited to simple data acquisition tasks, such networks can be considered complex geo-distributed data processing...»

«United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Homeland Security, House of Representatives PERSONNEL September 2014 SECURITY CLEARANCES Additional Guidance and Oversight Needed at DHS and DOD to Ensure Consistent Application of Revocation Process GAO-14-640 September 2014 PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES Additional Guidance and Oversight Needed at DHS and DOD to Ensure Consistent Application of Revocation Process Highlights of GAO-14-640, a report to the...»

«183893 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Divisions 93 and 95 of Article I of Chapter IX of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish mandatory standards for earthquake hazard reduction in existing wood-frame buildings with soft, weak, or open-front walls and existing non-ductile concrete buildings, and amending Sections 152.02, 152.04, 152.05 and 152.08 of Article 2 of Chapter XV of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to grant authority to the Rental Adjustment Commission to modify Tenant...»

«REVISTA INVESTIGACION OPERACIONAL VOL. 35, NO. 1, 27-34, 2014 UN ALGORITMO DEL MÉTODO DE INTEGRACIÓN DE VARIABLES PARA LA SOLUCIÓN DEL PROBLEMA MÁXIMO CLIQUE PONDERADO Gustavo Toranzo Lorca*1 y José Arzola Ruiz** *Departamento de Visualización y Realidad Virtual. Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas (UCI). Carretera a San Antonio Km 2½, La Habana, Cuba. **Centro de Estudios de Matemática para las Ciencias Técnicas. Instituto Superior Politécnico “José Antonio Echeverría”...»

«MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) WD78163 Respondent, ) v. ) OPINION FILED: ) SCOTT WILLIAM ECKERT, ) March 15, 2016 ) Appellant. ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston County, Missouri Honorable Thomas Nichols Chapman, Judge Before Division Three: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, J., and Joseph M. Ellis, Sr. J. 1 Mr. Scott W. Eckert appeals his convictions under section 575.270 2 for three class C felony victim-tampering counts, for each of...»

«Working Paper Series of the Graduate Centre Humanities and Social Sciences of the Research Academy Leipzig No. 9 Ulf Engel Unconstitutional Changes of Government – New AU Policies in Defence of Democracy Leipzig 2010 Ulf Engel: Unconstitutional Changes of Government – New AU Policies in Defence of Democracy Copyright by the author of this working paper Working Paper Series of the Graduate Centre Humanities and Social Sciences of the Research Academy Leipzig, No.9, Leipzig 2010. The Working...»

«COPYABLE STRUCTURES ´ ANTONIO MONTALBAN Abstract. We introduce the notions of copyable and diagonalizable classes of structures. We then show how these notions are connected to two other notions that had already been studied for some particular classes of structures, namely the listability property and the low property. The main result of this paper is the characterizations of the classes of structures with the low property, that is, the classes whose low members all have computable copies. We...»

«Operador de una Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales UNIVERSIDAD MAYOR DE SAN SIMÓN MINI-CURSO DE RIESGO MICROBIANO Tutor: Ing. Verbyla Matthew CASO DE ESTUDIO: Operador de una Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales Presentado por: ALIAGA MELENDEZ ROCIO AYALA CANO CARMEN FUENTES VERA MELIZZA FLORES APAZA NORMA FIGUEROA YERKO 29 de Agosto del 2014 COCHABMABA – BOLIVIA Operador de una Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales OPERADOR DE UNA PLANTA DE TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES 1....»

«University of Connecticut DigitalCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 5-14-2013 The Power of Perceptions: How Social Capital is being impacted by Crime and Corruption in Mexico Pablo G. Paras ceop98@prodigy.net.mx Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Paras, Pablo G., The Power of Perceptions: How Social Capital is being impacted by Crime and Corruption in Mexico (2013). Doctoral...»

«PRINCIPIOS PARA LA INTEGRACIÓN DE LOS SABERES EN LA UNIVERSIDAD FASTA Dirección Fr. Dr. Aníbal E. Fosbery O.P. Universidad FASTA Ediciones 2010 2016 Bicentenario de la Patria Mar del Plata, 2012 PRINCIPIOS PARA LA INTEGRACIÓN DE LOS SABERES EN LA UNIVERSIDAD FASTA Universidad FASTA Autoridades Gran Canciller Fr. Dr. Aníbal Ernesto Fosbery O.P. Rector Dr. Juan Carlos Mena Vicerrector Académico Dr. Alejandro Gabriel Campos Vicerrector de Formación Pbro. Dr. Néstor Alejandro Ramos...»

«The Future of Journalism Papers from a conference organised by the BBC College of Journalism Editor: Charles Miller Conference producer: David Hayward CoJo Publications: 1 © BBC College of Journalism 2009 Contents Preface 5 1. The End of Fortress Journalism by Peter Horrocks 6 2. Introducing Multimedia to the Newsroom by Zoe Smith 18 3. Multimedia Reporting in the Field by Guy Pelham 25 4. Dealing with User-Generated Content: is it Worth it? by Paul Hambleton 32 5. Video Games: a New Medium...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.theses.xlibx.info - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.