WWW.THESES.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Theses, dissertations, documentation
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 8 | 9 || 11 | 12 |   ...   | 28 |

«A report to the Assistant Treasurer Inspector-General of Taxation October 2013 Review into aspects of the Australian Taxation Office’s use of ...»

-- [ Page 10 ] --

Risk managers develop and implement strategies to mitigate their risks. The strategies outline how the risk will be deterred, and how it will be dealt with at an operational and tactical level.176

3.84 Risk managers consult with technical experts and officers from the ATO’s Risk Intelligence and Systems Support (RI&SS) team to develop risk filters to assist in detecting risks.177

3.85 Whilst any officer in LB&I can recommend a taxpayer to be subjected to a risk review, risk managers are responsible for considering the risk filter output and regularly making recommendations for case selection.

3.86 Where a taxpayer has not been brought to the attention of the risk manager (or anyone else in LB&I) via the risk filters, the taxpayer may nevertheless be the subject of a risk recommendation due to qualitative information, such as media coverage of a large transaction or intelligence from other sources.178 All recommendations are

–  –  –

considered by the CSSC, and must be signed-off by the LB&I Executive before commencement of a risk review.179

3.87 In the absence of qualitative information and risk filter output, it is possible for a segment of the lower consequence taxpayer population to have little contact with the ATO. Minutes from the December 2012 CSSC workshop indicate that possibly 500 lower risk taxpayers had not had any ATO contact for three years. As a result, it was indicated that the ATO (the Compliance Assurance & Governance and RI&SS teams) were examining a more robust profiling and risk assessment process for lower

consequence taxpayers.180 The minutes also indicate that:

The statistics above show a funnelling effect where initially a large number of risk recommendations were not considered due to low materiality or low risk rating in the output. The numbers that are then considered are whittled down via analysis and cross-referencing to previous cases until only a small number of the original population is left for new recommendations.

–  –  –

3.88 As a result, the ATO’s CSSC has identified a number of opportunities for improvement to the risk filter process.

3.89 The minutes also indicate that risk managers expressed a desire to work more closely with the LB&I Operations teams (compliance teams that undertake risk reviews etc) to assist them in identifying risks in taxpayer information and ‘asking the right questions’ of the taxpayer. By working more closely with them, risk managers may assist in improving the capability of the compliance teams.182

TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF RDF CATEGORISATION

3.90 Once a taxpayer’s risk categorisation has been determined by the moderation panel, the ATO begins a process to author and issue the RDF notification letter. The

letter advises taxpayers of their categorisation:

In 2011–12, for the first time we informed most large business in a single letter about our view of their relative risk of non‑compliance for GST, income tax and excise.183

3.91 For higher risk and key taxpayers, the letters are sent to the CEO, while letters for lower risk and medium risk taxpayers are sent to the public officer.184 Senior executive ATO officers also meet with their tax managers to explain the ATO’s views and discuss any concerns.185

–  –  –

3.92 Senior ATO management advised during this review that it expects compliance teams and officers to discuss the potential contents of the letter with the tax manager during the letter development process so that tax managers should not be surprised by the contents of the letter when it is issued.186

3.93 The RDF notification letters are the subject of a forty-step production process with several ATO staff involved.187 The process seeks to ensure adequate review of the compliance teams and moderation panel output and relevant Second Commissioner oversight and approval is obtained. This improved process was in response to Recommendation 4.1 of the IGT’s LB&I Review.

3.94 The ATO’s moderation panel documents indicate that the key taxpayer segment is further subdivided into: ‘key with no concerns, key with some concerns, key with significant concerns’.188 This subdivision is not apparent in the LBTC booklet discussion about the RDF quadrants, nor in the RDF fact sheet.189 However, the recent ATO publication Real-time compliance engagement approach for higher consequence taxpayers in the large market shows key taxpayers and higher risk taxpayers displayed as a spectrum, rather than two halves.190

3.95 This is consistent with the Second Commissioner’s speech in 2011 regarding

the categorisations and letters:

–  –  –

3.96 For higher consequence taxpayers, the RDF notification letters only describe whether a taxpayer has been categorised as a key taxpayer or a higher risk taxpayer.

The letter does not use sub-categories. Rather, moderation panel documents suggest that sub-categories are used to assist in developing the tone and content of the RDF notification letter. For example, where the ATO has some concerns about a key taxpayer, it will outline those concerns in the letter.

3.97 The ATO has advised that all higher consequence RDF notification letters should contain the details of a senior executive contact officer who is available to discuss the categorisation with the taxpayer.





ATO communication to IGT, 15 February 2013.

Australian Taxation Office, RDF Notification Letter Process.

Australian Taxation Office, RDF Moderation Panel Minutes 14 June 2012.

Australian Taxation Office, Risk differentiation framework fact sheet (28 March 2012). http://www.ato.gov.au.

Australian Taxation Office, Real-time compliance engagement approach for higher consequence taxpayers in the large market fact sheet (15 February 2013), http://www.ato.gov.au.

Quigley, above n 88.

–  –  –

ADDITIONAL HIGHER CONSEQUENCE REQUIREMENTS — TAXPAYER ASSURANCE

PLANS (TAPS)

3.98 Compliance teams dealing with higher consequence taxpayers are expected to

develop taxpayer assurance plans (TAPs). These plans are:

–  –  –

Teams are required to have a three year taxpayer assurance plan for each higher consequence taxpayer using a whole of ATO/whole of taxpayer approach. Each plan should be endorsed by the relevant SES leader and periodically updated.192

3.99 The TAP is intended to document an understanding of the current state of the relationship between the taxpayer and the ATO, including the taxpayer’s compliance, their attitude towards compliance, the intended goal of the plan, the resources to achieve that goal and the approaches required to ‘turn the vision into reality’.193

3.100 As the TAP only caters for higher consequence taxpayers, it provides examples of intended outcomes for higher risk taxpayers and key taxpayers only. The examples generally focus on increasing or maintaining the taxpayer’s commitment to real time disclosure of tax risks to the ATO.

3.101 The ATO’s compliance teams document their understanding of the taxpayer’s business using an adaptation of the ATO BISEP model explained in Chapter 2. This is essentially a taxpayer profile that documents the taxpayer’s past compliance behaviour, including past interactions with the ATO. This profile section also contains a section for the ‘rationale for the risk category rating’. This ensures that compliance teams outline the reasons why the taxpayer received the RDF categorisation that it did.

3.102 The profile section of the TAP also contains a section to record the compliance team’s observations about the taxpayer’s risk management and governance function.

This is considered important because:

Reviewing a taxpayer’s risk management and governance function is critical to understanding its business and behaviours. Aside from its importance in assisting teams to better understand the business, taxpayers must be able to demonstrate sound tax risk management processes and a willingness to work with us in order to be considered for an ACA (providing the taxpayer meet our other ACA criteria).194 3.103 The TAP also expects compliance teams to establish protocols with taxpayers to facilitate relationship management at both the strategic and operational levels. The protocols are designed to assist where differences of opinion or disputes arise.

Australian Taxation Office, Taxpayer assurance planning guide for higher consequence taxpayers July 2011.

–  –  –

3.105 The TAP is to include the manner in which the ATO-taxpayer relationship is to be managed and resourced within the ATO, with compliance teams documenting the internal resourcing and governance arrangements to implement the strategy.

3.106 The section of the TAP entitled ‘what needs to be done?’ provides guidance to compliance teams about their approach to information gathering and risk assessment in light of what the ATO knows about the taxpayer (captured earlier in the TAP) and their RDF risk categorisation. For example, it provides examples of kinds of ‘monitoring’ and information gathering approaches that do not involve taxpayer contact as well as approaches that do.196

ATO REVIEW OF THE RISK CATEGORISATION TEMPLATE

3.107 In October 2012, the ATO completed a review of the template, with a business analyst seeking feedback from the main users of the template, the LB&I compliance teams. The review noted that there was a degree of overlap between the information entered in the template and that already documented in the TAP.197

3.108 Feedback also indicated that compliance teams would like to receive feedback from the RDF moderation panel about the compliance teams’ work, as well as information about how the moderation panel uses the information in the template.198

3.109 The review also noted an opportunity to streamline the notification letter process by using technology to reduce the amount of manual re-working of content from the template through to the eventual letter issuance.199

3.110 The ATO advised the IGT during this review that it was undertaking a review to better integrate the TAP, the template, and PCR related documentation and to reduce overlap and manual data entry.200

3.111 A summary of the process for higher consequence taxpayers can be shown diagrammatically in Figure 11: Simplified higher consequence taxpayer risk

categorisation process below:

–  –  –

Australian Taxation Office, Higher Consequence Taxpayer Risk Categorisation Revision: Revision of the 2012 Higher Consequence Taxpayer Risk categorisation template and related processes with the purpose of improving annual taxpayer categorisation. Revised 2/10/2012.

Ibid Requirement R14 and R4.

Ibid Requirement R11.

ATO communication to IGT, 19 April 2013.

–  –  –

3.112 This report now considers the specific concerns stakeholders raised in submissions. The IGT will discuss these and related materials, making observations and, where appropriate, recommendations.

STAKEHOLDER CONCERN — TRANSPARENCY OF THE RISK CATEGORISATION

PROCESS

3.113 Stakeholders raised concerns about certain aspects of the ATO’s RDF as used by LB&I. Of particular concern was the underlying process that the ATO used to categorise taxpayers. The LBTC booklet notes the use of a moderation process, but no further detail is given about it.201

3.114 Stakeholders generally supported the appropriate use of qualitative inputs for the RDF process, recognising that a purely quantitative approach in this market segment will often be impractical. They were concerned, however, to ensure that there was adequate oversight of any process requiring professional judgement or use of subjective measures by ATO officers. The underlying concern was that ATO LB&I audit staff involved in risk rating taxpayers would be heavily influenced by their perceptions of interactions and their own organisational or personal behavioural biases.

–  –  –

3.115 Stakeholder concerns were also directed at the ATO categorisation process for higher consequence taxpayers regarding the key taxpayer or higher risk taxpayer delineation.

3.116 The process for deciding a higher consequence taxpayer’s risk categorisation is based on the template as noted. This contains the compliance team’s consideration of both the consequence and likelihood factors, concluding with their risk categorisation recommendation.

–  –  –

• a preliminary judgment by the compliance team;

• providing a starting point for the moderation panel to assess the appropriateness of the recommendation; and

• setting out how that taxpayer sits in the RDF relative to other taxpayers.202

3.118 The template and recommendation are then considered by the ATO’s moderation panel. The moderation panel considers all the higher consequence taxpayer templates to assist in determining relativity. The moderation panel documents their decisions, which may be a confirmation or variation of the categorisation proposed by the compliance team. This decision is then escalated to the LB&I Executive whereby the categorisation is ratified.

3.119 The ATO’s Internal Audit examined a sample of completed templates and found that ‘comparable evaluation and evidencing methods were used for all sampled taxpayers despite different business contexts’.203 IGT observations

3.120 The moderation panel is an important control measure implemented by the ATO to ensure that risk categorisations of higher consequence taxpayers are not adopted or changed by the action of a single ATO officer or compliance team. As noted in paragraph 3.67 above, similar control measures are in place for lower consequence taxpayers, whose risk categorisations must be approved by the CSSC.

3.121 The IGT also acknowledges that the use of the template is an important

measure to facilitate:



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 8 | 9 || 11 | 12 |   ...   | 28 |


Similar works:

«512 Transparencia, gobernanza y traducción: ¿ha llegado la hora de un enfoque funcional? INGEMAR STRANDVIK Servicio de Traducción, Comisión Europea Luxemburgo ingemar.strandvik@cec.eu.int Resumen El objetivo de esta comunicación es ubicar la traducción que se hace en las instituciones de la Unión Europea en el contexto de la transparencia y de la llamada gobernanza europea, dos de las prioridades políticas de hoy. La hipótesis es que se atisban cambios importantes para la actividad...»

«Evaluation report TEEN project Sixth meeting – Livingston – UK S IXTH MEETING – L IVINGSTON – UK This report contains the evaluation analysis of the filled out questionnaire about the sixth meeting in Livingston of the TEEN project. All questions of the filled out with a small evaluation supportedmeeting in This report contains the evaluation analysis will be covered questionnaire about the Kick off by a diagram. Pesaro of the TEEN project. All questions will be covered with a small...»

«Curriculum vitae Nombre: José Antonio Beltrán Gracia Fecha: 8 de Septiembre de 2009 Apellidos: Beltrán Gracia Nombre: José Antonio D.N.I.: 17.153.133 Fecha de nacimiento: 3.7.60 Situación profesional actual Organismo: Universidad de Zaragoza Facultad, Escuela o Instituto: Facultad de Veterinaria Depto./Secc./Unidad estr.: Dpto. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos. Unidad de Tecnología de los Alimentos Líneas de investigación Breve descripción, por medio de palabras claves, de...»

«(This page left intentionally blank) Welcome Letter Welcome To Our Team!! We welcome you to ROUND THE CLOCK. We look forward to the opportunity to work with you and want you to know that we recognize our employees as our most valuable resource. Our continued success in providing the highest quality of food, beverages and service to our customers depends on having quality people like yourself and your fellow employees. We want you to enjoy your time here and are committed to helping you succeed...»

«2011 Annual Operating Instructions Salmon / Pole / Champion, Owl Creek & Fisher Creek S&G Allotments 1: INTRODUCTION:Permitted Use: Permittee Allotment Numbers Season Owl Creek # 40700 850 e/l 07/06-07/30 850 e/l 08/01-08/20 Plateau Farms #4572 Salmon/Pole/Champion 950 e/l 06/11-08/20 (SPC) # 40500 1725 dries 08/21-10/20 1725 dries 08/21-10/20 Authorized Use: Upon payment of fees, you are authorized to graze as follows: Allotment Numbers Approximate Season* Owl Creek 850 e/l, band #2...»

«http://www.insna.org/Connections-Web/Volume26-2/4.Kapucu.pdf CONNECTIONS 26(2): 33-48 © 2005 INSNA Interorganizational Coordination in Dynamic Context: Networks in Emergency Response Management1 Naim Kapucu, Ph.D.2 Department of Public Administration, University of Central Florida This paper addresses the inter-organizational network in response to an extreme event. Specifically, this paper analyzes interactions among public, private, and nonprofit organizations that evolved in response to the...»

«*** Start by creating a simple table SQL CREATE TABLE reverse_details (id NUMBER, name VARCHAR2(20)); Table created. *** Next, create a Reverse Key Index on the id column (Note: a non-unique index is being used) SQL CREATE INDEX reverse_index ON reverse_details(id) REVERSE; Index created. *** Let's insert a whole bunch of rows and collect statistics SQL INSERT INTO reverse_details SELECT rownum, 'David Bowie' FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL = 1000000; 1000000 rows created. SQL COMMIT; Commit...»

«Manual de usuario Manual de usuario Manual de usuario Contenido Introducción P3 Características P3 Contenido del paquete P3 Primeros pasos P4-P7 Enganche de la muñequera P8 Inserción de las pilas P8-P9 Inserción de una tarjeta SD P10-P11 Reproducción cámara digital P12-P20 -Búsqueda de archivos de fotografía/video y audio P12 -Reproductor MPEG4 P12 -Búsqueda de archivos de audio P12 Reproductor MP3 P18-P20 -Reproducción P18 Visualización de letras P20 Grabadora de notas de voz...»

«  Regulatory Oversight and Auditor Market Share Daniel Aobdia Northwestern University d-aobdia@kellogg.northwestern.edu Nemit Shroff Massachusetts Institute of Technology shroff@mit.edu Current draft: June, 2016 Comments welcome ABSTRACT: We examine whether regulatory oversight of an auditor increases the perceived assurance value of their audits and consequently their market share. We use the PCAOB international inspection program as a setting to generate within country variation in...»

«Christmas Carols in British Sign Language Mansfield Deaf Club 6 1 Wood Street, Mansfield, Notts NG18 1QB, 3.30pm. Nottinghamshire Deaf Society 16 22 Forest Road West, Nottingham NG7 4EQ, 8pm. Attenborough St Mary’s 6 Toys & Gifts & Christingle Service (please bring new toys and gifts for children in need in Notts; collection for Children’s Society), 4.30pm. 13 Service of Nine Lessons & Carols, 6.30pm. 20 Family Carol Service, 5.30pm. Christmas Eve Crib Service (children are welcome to come...»

«28 ASSESSING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AFTER A FIRST COURSE IN STATISTICS3 ROBERT DELMAS University of Minnesota delma001@umn.edu JOAN GARFIELD University of Minnesota jbg@umn.edu ANN OOMS Kingston University a.ooms@kingston.ac.uk BETH CHANCE California Polytechnic State University bchance@calpoly.edu ABSTRACT This paper describes the development of the CAOS test, designed to measure students’ conceptual understanding of important statistical ideas, across three years of revision...»

«PURCHASING DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL ITB / RFP Procurement Req’s PO’s THE LEON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 3397 WEST THARPE ST. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32303 Revised May, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Non-Discrimination Statement 3 Tax Exempt Status 4 PO 6320 Purchasing and Contracting for Goods and Services 5 – 13 AP 6320A School Board Purchasing Procedures 14 Procurement Thresholds 14 Competitive Solicitations 15 Invitation to Bid (ITB) 15 – 16 Request...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.theses.xlibx.info - Theses, dissertations, documentation

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.