«Industrial Policy in Mozambique Matthias Krause Friedrich Kaufmann Industrial policy in Mozambique Matthias Krause Friedrich Kaufmann Bonn 2011 ...»
In 1999, Cramer described the GOM’s position on industrial policy as follows: “In Mozambique, all the evidence suggests that the state is in disarray, confused by a half-hearted ideological transformation and by being pulled constantly in different directions by donor interests (…), and lacks the capacity or will to produce a coherent and emphatic analysis and policy package for industrial sectors …” (Cramer 1999, 1263). Although there has been some progress since then, we still assess the GOM’s overall attitude towards industrial policy as being reactive to the interests of big investors and donors, rather than proactive or strategic. We base this assessment on our observation that the policy measures and projects that are enacted and implemented are those backed by investors’ coherent and clearly articulated interests (an investment-promotion law and mega projects in the energy and mining sector) or donors (liberalisation, privatisation, and Doing-Business-style reforms which were supported by a coalition of influential donor organisations).65 In contrast, more complex industrial policy approaches – such as in the field of SME promotion – that demand that the Government play an active role in providing strategic direction; building coalitions with enterprises, financial institutions, local governments and donors; and facilitating or building coordination platforms mainly exist on paper and lack the drive needed to get implemented on a relevant scale.
Although some projects pursue monitoring and evaluation approaches (mostly donordriven), there is no consistent system of feedback cycles and checks and balances to improve overall industrialpolicy learning. First of all, it would be difficult to create such a culture of learning through trial and error because there is not yet a coherent and coordinated industrial policy that deserves the name (see Chapter 5). Secondly, the GOM avoids accountability and tries to escape from transparent public evaluations of its policies. One exception is the annual Joint Review with the Program Aid Partners (PAP). However this review does not include industrial policy, since this is a cross-cutting issue that is not a high priority for most donors (see Chapter 4.3).
Other governance features also weaken the GOM’s capabilities in industrialpolicy management capability, for instance the capability to establish clear rules of the game for market-based competition, the capability to deliver services effectively, and the capability to avoid political capture. Widespread corruption results in the poor enforcement of measures meant to foster local industry (like the tax on raw cashewnut exports), in the opaque 65 See Castel-Branco (2008) for similar argumentation.
awarding of contracts based on favours, and in the intentional distortion of the implementation of business regulations to the advantage of inspectors and at the expense of businesses. FRELIMOparty dominance and weak checks and balances allow for selective interventions and service providers to be misused to transfer resources to constituencies before elections in order to secure votes (as was reported by some interviewees in the case of the INCAJU). Finally, the fact that prominent FRELIMO cadres (including President Guebuza) simultaneously hold public office and direct powerful business groups they acquired during the privatisation process, creates considerable conflicts of interest.66 This situation renders industrial policy, and economic policy in general, vulnerable to misuse for the particularistic benefit of enterprises owned by FRELIMO or party cadres.67 Despite this rather pessimistic assessment of Mozambique’s industrial policy management capability, it is important to acknowledge that some progress and learning have taken place during the last years. For instance capacities in the state administration (particularly at the central government level), in business associations and in think tanks are slowly improving and thus also the conditions for establishing coordination platforms for selective industrial policies. Moreover the government has corrected some deficiencies in the policy framework like e.g. the extremely generous tax exemptions for mega projects or the state-centred top-down approach to SME promotion. Finally, as highlighted above, the case studies have also gathered evidence for some positive experiences with selective approaches that could be replicated. Therefore prospects for a welfare-enhancing industrial policy in Mozambique that combines improvements to the investment climate and marketenhancing measures with targeted interventions to stimulate competitiveness and productivity growth of enterprises seem to improve. Nevertheless, for such an approach to be put in practice effectively the government and donors would have to radically revise their strategies and priorities and the governance would have to improve in terms of control of corruption and checks and balances.
66 See, e.g., the case of the concession for non-intrusive inspection services at the port of Maptuo (Mosse / Munguambe 2007).
67 Hanlon / Mosse (2009) even see a certain opportunity in this situation. They argue that the more development-oriented FRELIMO factions could use their combined political and economic power to engage in an industrialpolicy approach that would build on their own business empires (see Section 4.3).
56 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Industrial policy in Mozambique Bibliography Andersson, P. (2002): Impacto dos megaprojectos na economia Moçambicana, in: Gabinete de Estudos (ed.), A economia Moçambicana contemporânea, Maputo: Imprensa UEM, 531–558 Altenburg, T. (2009): Industrial policy for low- and lower-middle-income countries, Bonn: DIE, mimeo – (2011): Industrial policy in developing countries: overview and lessons from seven country cases, Bonn:
DIE (Discussion Paper 4/2011) Altenburg, T. / U. Eckhardt (2006): Productivity enhancement and equitable development: challenges for SME development, Vienna: UNIDO APRM (African Peer Review Mechanism) (2009): Country review report: Republic of Mozambique, Midrand, South Africa: African Peer Review Secretariat (Country Review Report 11/2009) Benfica, R. / D. Tschirley / L. Sambo (2002): Agro-industry and smallholder agriculture: institutional arrangements and rural poverty reduction in Mozambique, East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics (International Development Collaborative Policy Brief MZMINAG-FL-33e); online: http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/mozambique/flash/flash33e.pdf (accessed 24 Jul. 2011) Bertelsmann Foundation (2008): Bertelsmann transformations index: Mozambique country report, Gütersloh Beula, E. (2009): Moçambique continua com imprensa “parcialmente livre”, in: Savana 8 May 2009, 32
Borgarello, A. et al. (2004): What hinders small and medium entrepreneurs in Mozambique?, Maputo:
Ambasciata d’Italia (Quaderni della Cooperazione Italiana 7/2004)
Borowczak, W. (2008/2009): Projecto “Ambiente propício para o sector privado – Moçambique”:
estabelecimento de um sistema de monitoragem para a “Estratégia para a melhoria do ambiente de negócios”: internal documents on behalf of GTZ APSP, Maputo, mimeo Borowczak, W. / F. Kaufmann (2009): Encourage entrepreneurs, in: Development + Cooperation D+C 50 (6), 237–239 Cahen, M. (1993): Check on socialism in Mozambique: what check? what socialism?, in: Review of African Political Economy 20 (57), 46–59 Castel-Branco, C. N. (2002): An investigation into the political economy of industrial policy: the case of Mozambique, London: University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, Department of Economics (Doctoral thesis) – (2003): Indústria e industrialização em Moçambique: análise da situação actual e linhas estratégicas de desenvolvimento, Maputo: Cooperação Italiana – (2004): What is the experience and impact of South African trade and investment on growth and development of host economies?: a view from Mozambique: paper presented at the “Conference on stability, poverty reduction and South African trade and investment in southern Africa”, organised by SARPN / HSRC, Pretoria, 29/30 Mar. 2004; online: http://www.open.ac.uk/technology/mozambique/ pics/d97816.pdf (accessed 24 Jul. 2011) – (2005): Implicações do protocolo comercial da SADC para a família camponesa de Moçambique: Estudo Realizado na Província de Manica para a União Nacional de Camponeses, Maputo: UNAC – (2008): Aid dependency and development: a question of ownership?: a critical view, Maputo: IESE (Working Paper 01/2008) Castel-Branco, C. N. / N. Goldin (2003): Impacts of the MOZAL aluminum smelter on the Mozambican economy: final report, 21 Sep., Maputo; online: http://www.iese.ac.mz/lib/cncb/MOZAL_and _economic_development.pdf (accessed 24 Jul. 2011) Castel-Branco, C. N. / E. Cavadias (2009): O papel dos mega projectos na estabilidade da carteira fiscal em Moçambique: paper presented at: Autoridade tributária de Moçambique II: Seminário nacional sobre execução da política fiscal e aduaneira, 06/07 Mar. 2009, Maputo; online: http://www.iese.ac.mz/ lib/noticias/2009/MegaFiscalidade_ATM_Final.pdf (accessed 24 Jul. 2011) CIP (Centro de Integridade Publica) (2008): Avaliação da corrupção no sector florestal em Moçambique, Maputo (Documento de Discussão 7/2008) Chakravarti, A. (2005): Aid, institutions and development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publications German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Matthias Krause / Friedrich Kaufmann Clément, J. A. P. / S. A. Peiris (eds.) (2008): Sustaining growth takeoffs: lessons from Mozambique, in: A.
P. Clément / S. A. Peiris (eds.), Post-stabilization economics in sub-saharan Africa: lessons from Mozambique, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 11–56
Condon, N. / M. Stern (2009): Putting German aid for trade in perspective: Mozambique case study, Bonn:
DIE, mimeo Cramer, C. (1999): Can Africa industrialize by processing primary commodities? The case of Mozambican cashew nuts, in: World Development 27 (7), 1247–1266 CRN India (s. a.): Commodity: cashew; online: http://www.crnindia.com/commodity/cashew.html (accessed 22 Oct. 2009) Davies, C. (2008): The role of districts, background-paper for GTZ APSP about the compatability of regulation, Beira, mimeo De Barros, J. C. (2008): Study on how national public policies encourage or impede agribusiness innovation: cases of cassava, cashew and cattle in Mozambique; online: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/ docs/library/243549/MozambiqueReport.pdf (accessed 24 Jul 2011) De Tollenaere, M. (2006): Democracy assistance to post-conflict Mozambique: intentions and outcomes, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael (Working Paper 37/2006) DFID (Department for International Development) (2006): Pay and human resource management: issues and options, s. l.
DNEAP (Direcção Nacional de Estudos e Análise de Políticas) (2006): Job creation in Mozambique: is labour law reform the answer?, Maputo Eberherr, T. / F. Kaufmann / C. Simons-Kaufmann (2009): The potential for sustainable tourism in a less
developed country: policy recommendations from a case study in Inhambane province, Mozambique:
Conference paper, 4th International Science Conference, 3–5 Apr. 2009, Rhodes, Greece: University of the Aegean (International Science Conference Paper) EDE Consulting (2005): Fact finding and risk assessment: sustainability aspects in the Vietnamese cashew sector, prepared for Kraft Foods Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG., Vietnam: Hanoi EIU (The Economist Intelligence Unit) (2007): Country report Mozambique, Dec. 2007, London – (2008): Country profile Mozambique 2008, London – (2009): Country report Mozambique, Feb. 2009, London
EU (European Union) (2010): Mozambique: EU bilateral trade and trade with the world: DG Trade; online:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113422.pdf (accessed 24 Jul 2011) Evans, P. (1996): Government action, social capital and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy, in: World Development 24 (6), 1119–1132 FIAS (Foreign Investment Advisory Facility) (2006): The tourism sector in Mozambique: a value chain analysis, Vol. 1, Washington, DC: World Bank Fischer, F. et al. (2008): Government donor partnerships: Mozambique as a model of donor coordination, in: J. A. P. Clément / S. A. Peiris (eds.), Post-stabilization economics in sub-saharan Africa: lessons from Mozambique, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 238–287 Fox, L. (2008): Beating the odds: sustaining inclusion in Mozambique’s growing economy, Washington, DC: World Bank Francisco, A. A. da Silva / E. Barrenho (2008): Iniciativa FJC-GAPI mais caju Moçambique: desafio e visão, Maputo: FJC, GAPI Frey, A. (ed.) (2009): The investor, Maputo: Club of Mozambique Gabinete de Estudos (2003): A economia Moçambicana, Maputo: Imprensa UEM Groelsema, R. J. / J. M. Turner / C. Shenga (2009): Mozambique democracy and governance assessment, Burlington, Vt.: ARD Inc.; online: http://www.usaid.gov/mz//doc/misc/dg_assessment_2009.pdf (accessed 24 Jul. 2011)
Handley, G. (2008): Mutual accountability at the country level: Mozambique country case study, London:
Overseas Development Institute, Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure Hanlon, J. (2000): Power without responsibility: the World Bank and Mozambican cashew nuts, in: Review of African Political Economy 26 (83), 29–45 58 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Industrial policy in Mozambique Hanlon, J. / T. Smart (2008): Do bicycles equal development in Mozambique?, Woodbridge, UK: James Currey Hanlon, J. / M. Mosse (2009): Is Mozambique’s elite moving from corruption to development?: UNUWIDER conference on the role of elites in economic development, 12/13 Jun. 2009, Helsinki, Finland;